Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Hand (N Y). 2021 May;16(3):321-325. doi: 10.1177/1558944719855686. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
Many techniques for injection of trigger fingers exist. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the type of steroid or technique used for trigger finger injection altered clinical outcomes. Six hand surgeons at a single institution were surveyed regarding their injection technique, preferred steroid used, and protocol for repeat injection or indication for surgery for symptomatic trigger finger. A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent trigger finger injections was performed by randomly selecting 35 patients for each surgeon between January 2013 and December 2015. Demographic data at the time of presentation were collected. Outcome data during follow-up appointments were also recorded. A total of 210 patient charts were reviewed. Demographic data and initial presenting grade of triggering were similar among all groups. There was no significant difference in clinical course or eventual outcomes noted with injection technique. There were 70 patients in each steroid cohort. Patients receiving triamcinolone required additional injections compared with those receiving methylprednisolone and dexamethasone. Eventual surgical intervention was significantly higher in those patients receiving methylprednisolone. The methylprednisolone group also underwent operative release significantly earlier. Trigger finger injections with triamcinolone demonstrate a higher rate of additional injections when compared with dexamethasone and methylprednisolone. Patients who underwent methylprednisolone injection had surgical release performed earlier and more frequently than the other 2 groups. The choice of corticosteroid significantly affected clinical outcome in this study population. Clinicians performing steroid injections for trigger finger may wish to consider these results when selecting a specific agent.
许多注射扳机指的技术都存在。本研究旨在确定用于扳机指注射的类固醇类型或技术是否会改变临床结果。一家机构的 6 位手部外科医生接受了关于他们的注射技术、首选类固醇以及重复注射的方案或扳机指症状手术指征的调查。通过随机选择每位外科医生在 2013 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月之间进行的 35 名患者,对接受扳机指注射的患者进行了回顾性图表审查。收集了就诊时的人口统计学数据。还记录了随访预约期间的结果数据。共回顾了 210 份患者图表。所有组的人口统计学数据和初始触发等级相似。注射技术在临床过程或最终结果方面没有显著差异。每个类固醇组有 70 名患者。与接受甲基强的松龙和地塞米松的患者相比,接受曲安奈德的患者需要额外的注射。接受甲基强的松龙的患者最终接受手术干预的比例明显更高。接受甲基强的松龙注射的患者接受手术松解的时间也明显更早。与地塞米松和甲基强的松龙相比,曲安奈德注射扳机指显示出更高的追加注射率。接受甲基强的松龙注射的患者比其他 2 组更早且更频繁地接受手术松解。在该研究人群中,皮质类固醇的选择显著影响了临床结果。对扳机指进行类固醇注射的临床医生在选择特定药物时可能希望考虑这些结果。