• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗:系统评价方案。

Dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: protocol for a systematic review.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 16;9(6):e022271. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022271.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022271
PMID:31209080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6588972/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is routinely given to patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting; however, there is ongoing debate about the optimal duration, especially in specific patient groups. In the proposed systematic review, we intend to assess the optimal duration of DAPT following PCI with stenting, with a focus on clinically relevant patient subgroups.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will perform a comprehensive search of the published literature for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the benefits and harms of extended DAPT (>12 months) compared with short-term DAPT (6-12 months) following PCI with stenting (bare metal or drug eluting). ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP will also be searched to identify ongoing and completed clinical trials. Two independent reviewers will select studies for inclusion, and the risk of bias will be assessed by use of Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool. The primary outcome of interest is death (all-cause, cardiovascular, non-cardiovascular). Secondary outcomes are bleeding (major, minor, gastrointestinal), urgent target vessel revascularisation, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke and stent thrombosis. Subgroup data will be sought for patients with prior myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome at presentation and diabetes, and based on smoking status and age group. Data will be analysed by random-effects meta-analysis, and separate analyses will be performed for patient subgroups. Bayesian network meta-analysis will be performed to investigate the effect of individual P2Y12 inhibitors at different DAPT durations longer than 6 months.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This review will provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence of the benefits and harms associated with extending DAPT beyond 12 months following PCI with stenting and the effects on clinically important subgroups. The results of this review will inform clinical and policy decisions regarding the optimal treatment duration of DAPT following PCI with stenting.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO no. CRD42018082587.

摘要

简介

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)常规用于患者;然而,关于最佳持续时间,特别是在特定患者群体中,仍存在争议。在拟议的系统评价中,我们旨在评估 PCI 后接受支架置入术的患者 DAPT 的最佳持续时间,重点关注具有临床意义的患者亚组。

方法和分析

我们将全面搜索已发表的文献,以评估与 PCI 后接受支架置入术(裸金属或药物洗脱)的短期 DAPT(6-12 个月)相比,延长 DAPT(>12 个月)的获益和危害。还将搜索 ClinicalTrials.gov 和 ICTRP 以识别正在进行和已完成的临床试验。两名独立评审员将选择纳入的研究,使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。主要观察结果为死亡(全因、心血管、非心血管)。次要结局为出血(主要、次要、胃肠道)、紧急靶血管血运重建、主要不良心血管事件、心肌梗死、卒中和支架血栓形成。将根据既往心肌梗死、就诊时急性冠脉综合征和糖尿病,以及吸烟状况和年龄组,寻求患者亚组数据。将采用随机效应荟萃分析进行数据分析,并针对患者亚组进行单独分析。贝叶斯网络荟萃分析将用于研究在 PCI 后支架置入术 6 个月以上的不同 DAPT 持续时间内,单独使用 P2Y12 抑制剂的效果。

伦理与传播

本综述将全面概述 PCI 后支架置入术超过 12 个月延长 DAPT 与获益和危害相关的现有证据,以及对具有临床重要性的亚组的影响。本综述的结果将为 PCI 后支架置入术的 DAPT 最佳治疗持续时间的临床和政策决策提供信息。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO 编号 CRD42018082587。

相似文献

1
Dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: protocol for a systematic review.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 16;9(6):e022271. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022271.
2
Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: protocol for an umbrella review.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双重抗血小板治疗的最佳持续时间:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 4;7(4):e015421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015421.
3
Extended dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention in clinically important patient subgroups: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床重要亚组患者的延长双联抗血小板治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Feb 7;11(1):E118-E130. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210119. Print 2023 Jan-Feb.
4
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.
5
Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent: systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后药物洗脱支架双联抗血小板治疗的持续时间:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jun 28;365:l2222. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2222.
6
Short dual antiplatelet therapy followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.短期双联抗血小板治疗继以 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后延长双联抗血小板治疗:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jan 21;42(4):308-319. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa739.
7
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
8
Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Umbrella Review.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗的最佳持续时间:伞式综述。
Can J Cardiol. 2019 Aug;35(8):1039-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
9
Meta-analysis of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Monotherapy With P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗与 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jul 15;127:25-29. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.04.027. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The predictive value of the ARC-HBR criteria for in-hospital bleeding risk following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后ARC-HBR标准对院内出血风险的预测价值。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Oct 19;55:101527. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101527. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Extended dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention in clinically important patient subgroups: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床重要亚组患者的延长双联抗血小板治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Feb 7;11(1):E118-E130. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210119. Print 2023 Jan-Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗重点更新:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗特别工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.
2
Meta-Analysis of the Relative Efficacy and Safety of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者口服P2Y12抑制剂相对疗效与安全性的Meta分析
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;119(11):1723-1728. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
3
2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2016美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于冠心病患者双联抗血小板治疗疗程的重点更新指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Nov;152(5):1243-1275. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.044.
4
Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物洗脱支架植入术后双联抗血小板治疗的最佳持续时间:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:895-900. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.070. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
5
Meta-Analysis of the Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Treated With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.第二代药物洗脱支架治疗患者双联抗血小板治疗持续时间的Meta分析
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jun 1;117(11):1714-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
6
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review for the 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.双联抗血小板治疗时间:2016 年 ACC/AHA 指南双联抗血小板治疗时间的聚焦更新:冠心病患者双联抗血小板治疗时间的临床实践指南——美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会工作组报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):1116-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.512. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
7
Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: Meta-analysis of large randomised controlled trials.药物洗脱支架植入术后双重抗血小板治疗的持续时间:大型随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 17;5:13204. doi: 10.1038/srep13204.
8
Long (>12 Months) and Short (<6 Months) Versus Standard Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉支架置入术后双抗血小板治疗的长疗程(>12个月)和短疗程(<6个月)与标准疗程对比:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Am J Ther. 2017 Jul/Aug;24(4):e468-e476. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000307.
9
Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After DES Implantation: A Meta-Analysis of 11 Randomized Trials.药物洗脱支架植入术后双联抗血小板治疗的最佳持续时间:11项随机试验的荟萃分析
Angiology. 2016 Mar;67(3):224-38. doi: 10.1177/0003319715586500. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
10
Prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stenting: meta-analysis of randomized trials.药物洗脱支架置入术后延长双联抗血小板治疗:随机试验的荟萃分析
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Oct;104(10):887-901. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0860-1. Epub 2015 Apr 23.