Department of Pediatric Surgery, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany.
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Zentralklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Childs Nerv Syst. 2020 Feb;36(2):363-371. doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04215-y. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
The rate of positional plagiocephaly has increased since guidelines for the prevention of sudden infant death have led to the recommendation of positioning infants on their back during sleeping. Therapy includes repositioning, physiotherapy, and helmet therapy. To date, there is no consensus on the treatment of positional plagiocephaly. Therefore, it was the goal of this study to compare the results of physiotherapy and helmet therapy and to investigate if the size of the anterior fontanelle can be used as an additional parameter for the indication of the helmet therapy.
We enrolled 98 infants with a diagonal difference of 7 mm or more and plagiocephaly classified as Argenta II or more. Patients were grouped into infants with a small anterior fontanelle (< 25mm) and infants with a large anterior fontanelle (≥ 25mm). The patients were observed for at least 18 months. Sixty-eight patients were treated with repositioning and physiotherapy, whereas 30 infants received helmet therapy.
The remolding rate was significantly higher with the helmet therapy than with physiotherapy. In patients with a small fontanelle, a lower spontaneous remolding rate was seen pointing to their lower correction potential. Especially in these patients, plagiocephaly was reduced significantly more quickly with the helmet treatment than with physiotherapy, so that they may benefit from the helmet due to their otherwise reduced spontaneous remolding capacity.
The helmet therapy led to a faster reduction of the asymmetry than physiotherapy in this study. In patients with a small anterior fontanelle and therefore lower remolding potential, the helmet treatment was more effective than physiotherapy.
由于预防婴儿猝死综合征的指南建议婴儿在睡觉时仰卧,导致位置性斜头畸形的发生率增加。治疗方法包括重新定位、物理治疗和头盔治疗。迄今为止,对于位置性斜头畸形的治疗还没有共识。因此,本研究的目的是比较物理治疗和头盔治疗的结果,并研究前囟门的大小是否可以作为头盔治疗适应证的附加参数。
我们招募了 98 名斜头畸形程度为 7 毫米或以上、Argenta II 级或更高级别的婴儿。将患者分为前囟门较小(<25 毫米)和前囟门较大(≥25 毫米)的婴儿。观察这些患者至少 18 个月。68 名患者接受了重新定位和物理治疗,而 30 名婴儿接受了头盔治疗。
头盔治疗的重塑率明显高于物理治疗。在前囟门较小的患者中,自发性重塑率较低,表明其矫正潜力较低。特别是在这些患者中,头盔治疗比物理治疗更能迅速地减少斜头畸形,因此由于其自发重塑能力较低,他们可能会受益于头盔治疗。
在本研究中,头盔治疗比物理治疗更能迅速减少不对称性。在前囟门较小、重塑潜力较低的患者中,头盔治疗比物理治疗更有效。