Serrano Pablo E, Parpia Sameer, Valencia Marlie, Simunovic Marko, Bhandari Mohit, Levine Mark
Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Oct;89(10):1217-1223. doi: 10.1111/ans.15290. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
Incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following discharge for abdominal cancer surgery is uncertain.
We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies evaluating the incidence of VTE at 3 months from surgery. Studies indicating use of post-hospital VTE prophylaxis were excluded. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data abstraction and risk of bias. Random-effects model was used to estimate pooled incidence, and weights were estimated using inverse variance method. Statistical heterogeneity was explored via subgroup analysis.
Of 4215 abstracts retrieved, 11 reported the incidence of VTE at 3 months. There were three randomized trials (n = 520), one prospective cohort study (n = 284) and seven retrospective cohort studies (n = 65 308). VTE incidence among prospective studies was 9.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-16.4), while for retrospective studies was 2.2% (95% CI 1.4-3.0). Heterogeneity was high (I = 92% and 81%, respectively). The incidence of symptomatic VTE was 1.3% (95% CI 0.4-2.3) for prospective studies. VTE was diagnosed by screening venography in most of the prospective studies, whereas retrospective studies did not use a screening method. Subgroup analysis based on the type of organ surgery performed explained the heterogeneity.
VTE incidence following abdominal cancer surgery varies greatly depending on the study type, with differences largely explained by the method of assessment of VTE. The fact that VTE incidence among retrospective studies was closer to the incidence of symptomatic events (non-screen detected) in the prospective studies, suggests that the screened events were mostly asymptomatic and their clinical significance is unclear.
腹部癌症手术后出院时静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的发生率尚不确定。
我们检索了MEDLINE和Embase数据库,以查找评估术后3个月VTE发生率的研究。排除表明使用院后VTE预防措施的研究。两名独立的审阅者进行了研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。采用随机效应模型估计合并发生率,并使用逆方差法估计权重。通过亚组分析探讨统计异质性。
在检索到的4215篇摘要中,11篇报告了术后3个月VTE的发生率。有三项随机试验(n = 520)、一项前瞻性队列研究(n = 284)和七项回顾性队列研究(n = 65308)。前瞻性研究中的VTE发生率为9.6%(95%置信区间(CI)2.9 - 16.4),而回顾性研究中的发生率为2.2%(95%CI 1.4 - 3.0)。异质性较高(分别为I = 92%和81%)。前瞻性研究中症状性VTE的发生率为1.3%(95%CI 0.4 - 2.3)。大多数前瞻性研究通过筛查静脉造影诊断VTE,而回顾性研究未使用筛查方法。基于所进行的器官手术类型的亚组分析解释了异质性。
腹部癌症手术后VTE的发生率因研究类型而异,差异主要由VTE的评估方法解释。回顾性研究中的VTE发生率更接近前瞻性研究中症状性事件(未通过筛查检测到)的发生率,这一事实表明筛查出的事件大多无症状,其临床意义尚不清楚。