Li Changyong, Wang Fei, Deng Xiangsheng, Li Yizhuo, Zhao Shunbo
School of Civil Engineering and Communications, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China.
International Joint Research Lab for Eco-building Materials and Engineering of Henan, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China.
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jun 12;12(12):1891. doi: 10.3390/ma12121891.
In this paper, a new recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) was produced with composite coarse aggregate and fine recycled aggregate. The composite coarse aggregate was mixed into continuous gradation by large particle natural aggregate with small particle recycled aggregate. To explore the time-dependent developments of the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength of this new RAC, 320 groups of cubic specimens were tested at different curing ages from 3 days to 360 days to measure the compressive and splitting tensile strengths. The amount of large particle natural aggregate varied from zero to 70% in mass of the total coarse aggregate. The water/cement ratio was taken as 0.60, 0.49, 0.41 and 0.36 to represent four strength grades of the RAC at about C20, C30, C40 and C50. Based on the tested results, the curves of the compressive and tensile strengths of the RAC that changed with curing age are plotted, which clearly exhibit that the amount of large particle natural aggregate had a rational range in different strength grades of the RAC which had better aging strength. When the RAC was no larger than C30 with a water/cement ratio of 0.60 and 0.49, the amount of large particle natural aggregate should be no more than 30%; when the RAC was no less than C40 with a water/cement ratio of 0.41 and 0.36, the amount of large particle natural aggregate should be no less than 50%. Along with the general prediction of the strength development of all the tested RAC, the optimal predictive formulas are proposed for the strength development of RAC with a rational amount of natural aggregate. Meanwhile, the strength developments of RAC with a rational amount of natural aggregate are assessed by the time-dependent models proposed by the ACI Committee 209 and CEB-FIP MC 2010.
本文采用复合粗骨料和细再生骨料制备了一种新型再生骨料混凝土(RAC)。复合粗骨料由大粒径天然骨料和小粒径再生骨料混合而成连续级配。为探究这种新型RAC抗压强度和劈裂抗拉强度随时间的发展规律,对320组立方体试件在3天至360天的不同养护龄期进行试验,以测量其抗压强度和劈裂抗拉强度。大粒径天然骨料的用量占总粗骨料质量的比例从零到70%不等。水灰比分别取0.60、0.49、0.41和0.36,以代表RAC大约C20、C30、C40和C50的四个强度等级。根据试验结果,绘制了RAC抗压强度和抗拉强度随养护龄期变化的曲线,结果清楚地表明,在不同强度等级的RAC中,大粒径天然骨料的用量存在一个合理范围,在此范围内RAC具有较好的后期强度。当水灰比为0.60和0.49且RAC强度不大于C30时,大粒径天然骨料的用量不应超过30%;当水灰比为0.41和0.36且RAC强度不小于C40时,大粒径天然骨料的用量不应小于50%。在对所有试验RAC强度发展进行总体预测的同时,针对天然骨料用量合理的RAC强度发展提出了最优预测公式。同时,采用美国混凝土学会(ACI)委员会209和国际混凝土结构协会(CEB)-国际预应力混凝土协会(FIP)2010提出的时变模型评估了天然骨料用量合理的RAC的强度发展情况。