Wall D W
Fam Pract. 1987 Dec;4(4):322-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/4.4.322.
Few general practitioners in the United Kingdom do minor surgery, in contrast to their colleagues in other countries. The reasons are largely historical and relate to the structure and function of the National Health Service. This history of minor surgery describes its common occurrence before the NHS, its virtual disappearance after the NHS came about, and later revival by a few enthusiasts. The state of the art describes the wide range of surgical procedures in general surgery, orthopaedics, ear-nose-and-throat, gynaecology and ophthalmology. There are few complications, and very short waiting times in general practice minor surgery. The workload is not great. Economic studies show great saving may be made. Patients strongly prefer general practice minor surgery. In conclusion, despite many advantages, there remain major financial disadvantages for general practitioners in the United Kingdom to provide minor surgery for their patients.
与其他国家的同行相比,英国很少有全科医生做小手术。原因主要是历史性的,与国民医疗服务体系的结构和功能有关。这段小手术的历史描述了在国民医疗服务体系建立之前它的常见情况,在国民医疗服务体系出现后它几乎消失,以及后来一些热心人士使其复兴。目前的技术水平描述了普通外科、骨科、耳鼻喉科、妇科和眼科广泛的外科手术。在全科医生做的小手术中并发症很少,等待时间也非常短。工作量不大。经济研究表明可以节省大量费用。患者强烈倾向于全科医生做小手术。总之,尽管有许多优点,但英国的全科医生为患者提供小手术仍存在重大的经济劣势。