Suppr超能文献

潜在不适当处方的卫生系统成本:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,使用加拿大安大略省的关联卫生行政数据库。

The Health System Costs of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing: A Population-Based, Retrospective Cohort Study Using Linked Health Administrative Databases in Ontario, Canada.

作者信息

Black Cody D, Thavorn Kednapa, Coyle Doug, Bjerre Lise M

机构信息

School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Room 101, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, ON, K1G 5Z3, Canada.

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Box 511, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2020 Mar;4(1):27-36. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0143-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the health system costs from hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and medications due to potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in Ontario, Canada, at the population-level.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of individuals ≥ 66 years of age and prescribed at least one medication from April 2002 to March 2015 was identified using linked population-level health administrative databases from Ontario, Canada. Patients were identified as having PIP or no PIP by applying a subset of the Screening Tool of Older Persons' Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing/Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) criteria. The number of days spent in hospital, new medications prescribed, and ED visits in the 90 days following PIP or patient index date were captured, as well as the total costs from each of these health services. Count regression models were used to generate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for each outcome given the presence of PIP versus no PIP and combined with the prevalence of PIP to generate population attributable fractions (PAFs). The PAF was then multiplied by the cost for each health service to obtain the costs attributable to PIP in the whole cohort, and by age and sex.

RESULTS

PIP was associated with an increased rate of hospitalization (IRR 2.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.72-2.82), ED visits (IRR 1.87, 95% CI 1.82-1.92), and newly prescribed medications (IRR 1.13, 95% CI 1.13-1.14), resulting in PAFs of 55.7, 37.9, and 5.0% for each outcome, respectively. PIP was associated with 38.8% of the total spent on these healthcare services ($1.22 billion) in the 90 days after PIP. Costs attributable to PIP decreased with age despite increasing prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

PIP in older adults is a significant source of health system costs from healthcare service use beyond medication costs, with a significant portion of hospitalizations and ED visit costs attributable to PIP. Future work should focus on identifying strategies and priorities for intervention.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定加拿大安大略省因潜在不适当处方(PIP)导致的住院、急诊就诊和药物治疗方面的卫生系统成本,以人群为基础进行评估。

方法

利用加拿大安大略省的人口水平卫生行政数据库,确定了一个回顾性队列,队列中的个体年龄≥66岁,在2002年4月至2015年3月期间至少开具了一种药物处方。通过应用老年人潜在不适当处方筛查工具/提醒医生正确治疗的筛查工具(STOPP/START)标准的一个子集,将患者确定为有PIP或无PIP。记录PIP或患者索引日期后90天内的住院天数、新开具的药物以及急诊就诊情况,以及这些卫生服务各自的总成本。使用计数回归模型生成有PIP与无PIP情况下各结局的发病率比(IRR),并结合PIP的患病率生成人群归因分数(PAF)。然后将PAF乘以每项卫生服务的成本,以获得整个队列中归因于PIP的成本,并按年龄和性别进行划分。

结果

PIP与住院率增加(IRR 2.77,95%置信区间[CI] 2.72 - 2.82)、急诊就诊率增加(IRR 1.87,95% CI 1.82 - 1.92)以及新开具药物增加(IRR 1.13,95% CI 1.13 - 1.14)相关,各结局的PAF分别为55.7%、37.9%和5.0%。PIP与PIP后90天内这些医疗服务总支出的38.8%(12.2亿美元)相关。尽管患病率增加,但归因于PIP的成本随年龄增长而降低。

结论

老年人中的PIP是卫生系统成本的一个重要来源,不仅包括药物成本,还包括因使用医疗服务产生的成本,很大一部分住院和急诊就诊成本可归因于PIP。未来的工作应侧重于确定干预策略和重点。

相似文献

9
Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Hospitalized Older Adult High-Cost Health Care Users: A Pilot Study.
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2022 Jul 4;75(3):219-224. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.3122. eCollection 2022 Summer.
10
Comparing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing Tools and Their Association With Patient Outcomes.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Mar;68(3):526-534. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16239. Epub 2019 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

3
Drug utilisation study in hospitalised chronic kidney disease patients, using World Health Organisation prescribing indicators: an observational study.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Dec 4;17(1):2430436. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2430436. eCollection 2024.
5
Enhancing medication management of older adults in Qatar: healthcare professionals' perspectives on challenges, barriers and enabling solutions.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Oct 7;15:20420986241272846. doi: 10.1177/20420986241272846. eCollection 2024.
6
Lists of potentially inappropriate medications for older people in primary care: a systematic review of health outcomes.
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 May 20;40(5):e00016423. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN016423. eCollection 2024.
9
Can peer effects explain prescribing appropriateness? a social network analysis.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 28;23(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02048-7.
10
Randomised trial of general practitioner online education for prescribing and test ordering.
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Oct;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002351.

本文引用的文献

2
Frequency and cost of potentially inappropriate prescribing for older adults: a cross-sectional study.
CMAJ Open. 2016 Jun 22;4(2):E346-51. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20150131. eCollection 2016 Apr-Jun.
4
American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Nov;63(11):2227-46. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13702. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
5
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 6;12(10):e1001885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. eCollection 2015 Oct.
6
Analyzing hospitalization data: potential limitations of Poisson regression.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Aug;30(8):1244-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv071. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
7
STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2.
Age Ageing. 2015 Mar;44(2):213-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu145. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
8
Inappropriate prescribing: a systematic overview of published assessment tools.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jan;70(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1575-8. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
10
Potentially inappropriate prescribing and cost outcomes for older people: a national population study.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 May;69(5):543-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03628.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验