Comparison of the hindfoot axes of a multi-segment foot model to the underlying bony anatomy.

Musculoskeletal models used in gait analysis require coordinate systems to be identified for the body segments of interest. It is not obvious how hindfoot (or rearfoot) axes defined by skin-mounted markers relate to the anatomy of the underlying bones. The aim of this study was to compare the marker-based axes of the hindfoot in a multi-segment foot model to the orientations of the talus and calcaneus as characterized by their principal axes of inertia. Twenty adult females with no known foot deformities had radio-opaque markers placed on their feet and ankles at the foot model marker locations. CT images of the feet were acquired as the participants lay supine with their feet in a semi-weight bearing posture. The spatial coordinates of the markers were obtained from the images and used to define the foot model axes. Segmented masks of the tali and calcanei were used to create 3D bone models, from which the principal axes of the bones were obtained. The orientations of the principal axes were either within the range of typical values reported in the imaging literature or differed in ways that could be explained by variations in how the angles were defined. The model hindfoot axis orientations relative to the principal axes of the bones had little bias but were highly variable. Consideration of coronal plane hindfoot alignment as measured clinically and radiographically suggested that the model hindfoot coordinate system represents the posterior calcaneal tuberosity, rather than the calcaneus as a whole.