Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of Colorado, 1700 North Wheeling St, Mail Stop 112, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1863-1867. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06939-z. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
Surgical fires are a rare event that still occur at a significant rate and can result in severe injury and death. Surgical fires are fueled by vapor from alcohol-based skin preparations in the presence of increased oxygen concentration and a spark from an energy device. Carbon dioxide (CO) is used to extinguish electrical fires, and we sought to evaluate its effect on fire creation in the operating room. We hypothesize that CO delivered by the energy device will decrease the frequency of surgical fires fueled by alcohol-based skin preparations.
An ex vivo model with 15 × 15 cm section of clipped, porcine skin was used. A commercially available electrosurgical pencil with a smoke evacuation tip was connected to a laparoscopic CO insufflation system. The electrosurgical pencil was activated for 2 s at 30 watts coagulation mode immediately after application of alcohol-based surgical skin preparations: 70% isopropyl alcohol with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG-IPA) or 74% isopropyl alcohol with 0.7% iodine povacrylex (Iodine-IPA). CO was infused via the smoke evacuation pencil at flow rates from 0 to 8 L/min. The presence of a flame was determined visually and confirmed with a thermal camera (FLIR Systems, Boston, MA).
Carbon dioxide eliminated fire formation at a flow rate of 1 L/min with CHG-IPA skin prep (0% vs. 60% with no CO, p < 0.0001). Carbon dioxide reduced fire formation at 1 L/min (25% vs. 47% with no CO, p = 0.1) with Iodine-IPA skin prep and fires were eliminated at 2 L/min of flow with Iodine-IPA skin prep (p < 0.0001).
Carbon dioxide can eliminate surgical fires caused by energy devices in the presence of alcohol-based skin preps. Future studies should determine the optimal technique and flow rate of carbon dioxide in these settings.
手术火灾虽然罕见,但仍时有发生,且可能导致严重伤害和死亡。手术火灾是由酒精类皮肤准备物在增加的氧气浓度和能量设备产生的火花存在的情况下产生的蒸汽引起的。二氧化碳(CO)用于扑灭电气火灾,我们试图评估其在手术室中对火灾产生的影响。我们假设,能量设备输送的 CO 会降低由酒精类皮肤准备物引发的手术火灾的频率。
使用带有剪毛的 15×15 厘米猪皮的离体模型。将带有烟雾清除尖端的市售电外科笔连接到腹腔镜 CO 吹入系统。在应用酒精类手术皮肤准备物后立即以 30 瓦的凝固模式激活电外科笔 2 秒:70%异丙醇和 2%葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG-IPA)或 74%异丙醇和 0.7%聚维酮碘(碘 IPA)。通过烟雾清除笔以 0 至 8 L/min 的流速注入 CO。通过肉眼观察确定火焰的存在,并通过热像仪(FLIR Systems,波士顿,MA)确认。
CO 以 1 L/min 的流速可消除 CHG-IPA 皮肤准备物中的火灾形成(无 CO 时为 0%,有 CO 时为 60%,p<0.0001)。CO 可降低 1 L/min 时碘 IPA 皮肤准备物的火灾形成(无 CO 时为 25%,有 CO 时为 47%,p=0.1),并且碘 IPA 皮肤准备物在 2 L/min 的流速下可消除火灾(p<0.0001)。
CO 可以消除能量设备在存在酒精类皮肤准备物的情况下引发的手术火灾。未来的研究应确定这些环境中 CO 的最佳技术和流速。