Suppr超能文献

应用、安全性和有效性的血管内膜下血管成形术和再进入装置治疗髂动脉慢性完全闭塞:30 项研究和 1112 处病变的系统评价。

Use, Safety and Effectiveness of Subintimal Angioplasty and Re-Entry Devices for the Treatment of Iliac Artery Chronic Total Occlusions: A Systematic Review of 30 Studies and 1112 Lesions.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States; Division of Cardiology, Denver VA Medical Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, United States.

First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Mar;21(3):334-341. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.05.022. Epub 2019 May 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Management of iliac artery occlusive disease has changed dramatically over the past few decades. Secondary to advancement in endovascular technologies and techniques, percutaneous interventions have gradually replaced open surgical approaches even for the most difficult cases. In difficult to cross chronic total occlusions (CTO) of the iliac artery, subintimal angioplasty (SIA) with or without the use of re-entry devices (RED) offers a valuable alternative to intra-luminal crossing.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature for studies reporting procedural or short- and long-term clinical outcomes after the use of SIA, with or without RED use for iliac CTOs.

METHODS

PRISMA guidelines were followed. Literature search (PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL and EMBASE) and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers. Quantitative synthesis of the reported outcomes was applied when possible.

RESULTS

Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected as eligible for this systematic review, with a total of 1002 patients (61.3% males) and 1112 lesions treated with SIA. RED were used in 21.9% of the lesions. Critical limb ischemia was the indication in 51.4%. The overall procedural success rates were 85.8% for SIA and 88.5% for RED. The complication rate ranged from 0 to 10% among different series, but overall it was similar among the two groups (6.9% in the RED group and 6.7% among the SIA group). One year primary patency rates were around 60% in the RED. In the SIA only arm, there was a large heterogeneity, with patency rates ranging from 51.7% to 96.8%.

CONCLUSION

SIA with or without RED use is a safe and effective treatment for the treatment of iliac artery CTOs. Future studies are needed to delineate whether intraluminal crossing or SIA is more effective for endovascular treatment of iliac CTOs.

摘要

背景

在过去几十年中,髂动脉闭塞性疾病的治疗发生了巨大变化。由于腔内技术和技术的进步,即使对于最困难的病例,经皮介入治疗也逐渐取代了开放手术方法。在髂动脉慢性完全闭塞(CTO)难以通过的情况下,内膜下血管成形术(SIA)联合或不联合使用再进入装置(RED)为腔内通过提供了有价值的替代方法。

目的

系统回顾文献中关于 SIA 治疗髂动脉 CTO 的研究,评估单独使用 SIA 或联合使用 RED 的治疗效果。

方法

遵循 PRISMA 指南。两名独立研究人员进行文献检索(PubMed、Cochrane CENTRAL 和 EMBASE)和数据提取。在可能的情况下,对报告的结局进行定量综合分析。

结果

30 项研究符合纳入标准,被选为本次系统评价的合格研究,共纳入 1002 例患者(61.3%为男性)和 1112 处病变接受 SIA 治疗。RED 在 21.9%的病变中使用。主要适应证为严重肢体缺血(CLI),占 51.4%。SIA 的总体手术成功率为 85.8%,RED 的手术成功率为 88.5%。不同系列的并发症发生率为 0 至 10%,但两组之间的总体并发症发生率相似(RED 组为 6.9%,SIA 组为 6.7%)。RED 组一年的原发性通畅率约为 60%。在仅使用 SIA 的组中,通畅率差异较大,从 51.7%到 96.8%不等。

结论

SIA 联合或不联合 RED 使用是治疗髂动脉 CTO 的安全有效的方法。未来需要研究来阐明腔内通过或 SIA 对于髂动脉 CTO 的血管内治疗哪种方法更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验