Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Health Econ. 2019 Jul;28(7):921-936. doi: 10.1002/hec.3896.
In light of population aging, it is important to understand whether limiting public in-kind transfers to the elderly affects elderly mortality. I focus on home health care-a popular in-kind transfer-and I exploit variation in the Medicare home health care reimbursement that arose in 1997 in the United States to study whether cuts to government coverage of home health care affected elderly mortality. Under the identifying assumptions of the DID model, I find that the cuts affected total mortality for some men but not women, suggesting that changes in home health care can affect elderly mortality and differences in mortality between men and women. For men aged between 65 and 74, the Interim Payment System was associated with an increase in mortality equal to 0.6%, an effect in absolute value comparable to the mortality response to a one percentage point change in unemployment rates and within the range of other estimates of the impact of health insurance on elderly mortality.
鉴于人口老龄化,了解限制向老年人提供公共实物转移是否会影响老年人的死亡率非常重要。我关注家庭保健服务——一种受欢迎的实物转移——并利用美国 1997 年医疗保险家庭保健服务报销的变化来研究政府对家庭保健服务的覆盖范围的削减是否会影响老年人的死亡率。在 DID 模型的识别假设下,我发现这些削减对一些男性的总死亡率有影响,但对女性没有影响,这表明家庭保健服务的变化可能会影响老年人的死亡率,以及男性和女性之间的死亡率差异。对于 65 岁至 74 岁的男性,临时支付系统与死亡率增加 0.6%有关,这一效应的绝对值与失业率变化一个百分点对死亡率的影响相当,也在其他关于医疗保险对老年人死亡率影响的估计范围内。