Lancaster University, Fylde College, Department of Psychology, Lancaster, LA1 4YF, United Kingdom.
Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Aug;91:103425. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
There is conflicting evidence regarding whether children with Autism Spectrum Condition (ASC) and intellectual disabilities (ID) follow social pragmatic cues such as a speaker's eye gaze or pointing towards a novel object to assist mapping a new word onto a new object (e.g. fast mapping).
We test fast mapping from a speaker's gaze and pointing towards objects in children with ASC and ID with varying chronological and receptive language ages compared with receptive language matched groups of typically developing (TD) children.
Across eight trials, a speaker gazed and/or pointed towards one out of two objects while saying a new word. Pointing was either 'referential' (with intention), or 'incidental' (without obvious intention). To investigate whether children formed more robust word-to-object links rather than associative word-to-location ones, we reversed the original location of the objects in half of the test trials.
Children with ASC were as successful as TD children using social cues to form word-to-object mappings. Surprisingly, children with ID did not fast map from referential pointing, or when objects changed location.
Children with ID may use different processes to facilitate word learning compared to TD children and even children with ASC.
关于自闭症谱系障碍(ASC)和智力障碍(ID)儿童是否会遵循社交语用线索,例如说话者的目光注视或指向新物体,以帮助将新词映射到新物体上(例如快速映射),目前存在相互矛盾的证据。
我们测试了具有不同年龄的 ASC 和 ID 儿童与具有匹配接受性语言年龄的典型发育(TD)儿童相比,从说话者的注视和指向物体中进行快速映射的能力。
在八次试验中,说话者注视和/或指向两个物体中的一个,同时说出一个新词。指向可以是“指示性的”(有意图),也可以是“随意的”(没有明显的意图)。为了研究儿童是否形成了更牢固的词与物的联系,而不是联想词与位置的联系,我们在一半的测试试验中反转了物体的原始位置。
使用社交线索形成词与物的映射,ASC 儿童与 TD 儿童一样成功。令人惊讶的是,ID 儿童不会从指示性的指向或物体位置变化中进行快速映射。
与 TD 儿童甚至 ASC 儿童相比,ID 儿童可能使用不同的过程来促进词汇学习。