Suppr超能文献

选择性胎儿生长受限或出生体重不一致对单绒毛膜双胎长期神经发育的影响:一项系统文献综述

The Impact of Selective Fetal Growth Restriction or Birth Weight Discordance on Long-Term Neurodevelopment in Monochorionic Twins: A Systematic Literature Review.

作者信息

Groene Sophie G, Tollenaar Lisanne S A, Oepkes Dick, Lopriore Enrico, van Klink Jeanine M M

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.

Division of Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 28;8(7):944. doi: 10.3390/jcm8070944.

Abstract

The aim of this review was to assess the impact of selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) and/or birth weight discordance (BWD) on long-term neurodevelopment in monochorionic (MC) twins. Five out of 28 articles assessed for eligibility were included. One article concluded that the incidence of long-term neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) was higher in BWD MC twins (11/26, 42%) than in BWD dichorionic (DC) (5/38, 13%) and concordant MC twins (6/71, 8%). BWD MC twins had a 6-fold higher risk of cerebral palsy compared to DC twins (5/26, 19% vs. 1/40, 3%, 0.05). Another article described a linear relationship between birth weight and verbal IQ scores, demonstrating a 13-point difference for a 1000 gram BWD between the twins, with a disadvantage for the smaller twin ( 0.0001). Three articles analyzing within-pair differences showed that the smaller twin more frequently demonstrated mild NDI (6/80, 8% vs. 1/111, 1%) and lower developmental test scores (up to 5.3 points) as opposed to its larger co-twin. Although these results suggest that MC twins with sFGR/BWD are at increased risk of long-term NDI as compared to BWD DC or concordant MC twins, with a within-pair disadvantage for the smaller twin, the overall level of evidence is of moderate quality. As only five articles with a high degree of heterogeneity were available, our review mainly demonstrates the current lack of knowledge of the long-term outcomes of MC twins with sFGR/BWD. Insight into long-term outcomes will lead to improved prognostics, which are essential in parent counseling and crucial in the process of forming a management protocol specifically for twins with sFGR to optimally monitor and support their development.

摘要

本综述的目的是评估选择性胎儿生长受限(sFGR)和/或出生体重不一致(BWD)对单绒毛膜(MC)双胎长期神经发育的影响。在评估是否符合纳入标准的28篇文章中,有5篇被纳入。一篇文章得出结论,BWD的MC双胎中,长期神经发育障碍(NDI)的发生率(11/26,42%)高于BWD的双绒毛膜(DC)双胎(5/38,13%)和体重一致的MC双胎(6/71,8%)。与DC双胎相比,BWD的MC双胎患脑瘫的风险高6倍(5/26,19%对1/40,3%,P<0.05)。另一篇文章描述了出生体重与言语智商得分之间的线性关系,表明双胎之间出生体重相差1000克时,言语智商得分相差13分,较小的双胎处于劣势(P<0.0001)。三篇分析双胎内差异的文章表明,与较大的双胎相比,较小的双胎更频繁地表现出轻度NDI(6/80,8%对1/111,1%)和较低的发育测试得分(相差高达5.3分)。尽管这些结果表明,与BWD的DC双胎或体重一致的MC双胎相比,患有sFGR/BWD的MC双胎发生长期NDI的风险增加,且双胎内较小的双胎处于劣势,但总体证据质量为中等。由于仅有5篇异质性程度较高的文章,我们的综述主要表明目前对患有sFGR/BWD的MC双胎的长期结局缺乏了解。深入了解长期结局将有助于改善预后,这在为父母提供咨询时至关重要,并且在制定专门针对患有sFGR的双胎的管理方案以最佳地监测和支持其发育的过程中也至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4410/6678939/8d46b2ec0c5c/jcm-08-00944-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Changes in structural brain development after selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twins.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun;59(6):747-755. doi: 10.1002/uog.24832.
3
Significance of placental cord insertion site in twin pregnancy.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;52(3):378-384. doi: 10.1002/uog.18914.
4
Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):11-23. doi: 10.1002/uog.18966.
6
Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of monochorionic and matched dichorionic twins.
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 28;4(8):e6815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006815.
7
Placental characteristics in growth-discordant monochorionic twins: a matched case-control study.
Placenta. 2012 Mar;33(3):171-4. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.12.004. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
8
Cerebral injury in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review.
Prenat Diagn. 2014 Mar;34(3):205-13. doi: 10.1002/pd.4298. Epub 2014 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twins: Diagnosis and Management.
Matern Fetal Med. 2022 Sep 21;4(4):268-275. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000171. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Evidence for ethnicity and location as regulators of the newborn blood metabolome: a monozygous twin study.
Front Nutr. 2024 Jan 4;10:1259777. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1259777. eCollection 2023.
7
Changes in structural brain development after selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twins.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun;59(6):747-755. doi: 10.1002/uog.24832.
9
Monochorionic Twins: A Delicate Balance.
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 17;8(10):1711. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101711.

本文引用的文献

2
Cognitive outcome in childhood of birth weight discordant monochorionic twins: the long-term effects of fetal growth restriction.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Nov;103(6):F512-F516. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313691. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
3
Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies.
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Dec;22(6):376-382. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 20.
5
Etiological Subgroups of Small-for-Gestational-Age: Differential Neurodevelopmental Outcomes.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 8;11(8):e0160677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160677. eCollection 2016.
6
Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic twins: changing patterns in umbilical artery Doppler flow and outcomes.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;49(3):387-393. doi: 10.1002/uog.15933. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
7
Monochorionic versus dichorionic twins: Are obstetric outcomes always different?
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jul;36(5):598-601. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1116501. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
8
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Extremely Preterm Infants.
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Feb;33(3):318-28. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1571202. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
9
Neuro-developmental outcome of a large cohort of growth discordant twins.
Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Mar;175(3):381-9. doi: 10.1007/s00431-015-2648-8. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
10
Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;70:68-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验