Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, New South Wales.
Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, New South Wales.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019 Oct;43(5):464-469. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12913. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
Uptake of screening through the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program remains low. General practice guidelines support the general practitioners' role to offer CRC screening. This study tests the effect that an intervention including point-of-care FOBT provision, printed screening advice and GP endorsement has on self-reported FOBT uptake.
A multisite, 1:1 parallel-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Participants aged 50-74, at average risk of CRC and overdue for screening were recruited from four general practices in New South Wales, Australia, from September 2016 to May 2017. Self-report of FOBT up to eight weeks post baseline.
A total of 336 participants consented to complete a baseline survey (64% consent rate), of which 123 were recruited into the trial (28 usual care days and 26 intervention days). Follow-up data was collected for 114 participants (65 usual care and 49 intervention). Those receiving the intervention had ten times greater odds of completing screening compared to usual care (39% vs. 6%; OR 10.24; 95%CI 2.9-36.6, p=0.0006).
A multicomponent intervention delivered in general practice significantly increased self-reported FOBT uptake in those at average risk of CRC. Implications for public health: General practice interventions could serve as an important adjunct to the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program to boost plateauing screening rates.
澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的筛查参与率仍然较低。一般实践指南支持全科医生在提供 CRC 筛查方面的作用。本研究测试了包括即时护理粪便潜血检测提供、印刷筛查建议和全科医生认可在内的干预措施对自我报告的粪便潜血检测参与率的影响。
这是一项多地点、1:1 平行臂、集群随机对照试验。参与者年龄在 50-74 岁之间,处于结直肠癌平均风险且筛查逾期,于 2016 年 9 月至 2017 年 5 月从澳大利亚新南威尔士州的四个全科医生诊所招募。在基线后八周内自我报告粪便潜血检测。
共有 336 名参与者同意完成基线调查(64%的同意率),其中 123 名被招募入试验(28 个常规护理日和 26 个干预日)。对 114 名参与者进行了随访数据收集(65 名常规护理和 49 名干预)。与常规护理相比,接受干预的参与者完成筛查的可能性高出十倍(39%比 6%;OR 10.24;95%CI 2.9-36.6,p=0.0006)。
在全科医生实践中实施的多组分干预措施显著提高了 CRC 平均风险人群中自我报告的粪便潜血检测参与率。对公共卫生的影响:全科医生干预措施可以作为澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的重要补充,以提高筛查率。