Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 2;20(13):3246. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133246.
Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) confers cardioprotection in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Despite intense research, the translation of RIC into clinical practice remains a challenge. This may, at least partly, be due to confounding factors that may modify the efficacy of RIC. The present review focuses on cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, medication use and procedural variables which may modify the efficacy of RIC in patients with STEMI. Findings of such efficacy modifiers are based on subgroup and post-hoc analyses and thus hold risk of type I and II errors. Although findings from studies evaluating influencing factors are often ambiguous, some but not all studies suggest that smoking, non-statin use, infarct location, area-at-risk of infarction, pre-procedural Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow, ischemia duration and coronary collateral blood flow to the infarct-related artery may influence on the cardioprotective efficacy of RIC. Results from the on-going CONDI2/ERIC-PPCI trial will determine any clinical implications of RIC in the treatment of patients with STEMI and predefined subgroup analyses will give further insight into influencing factors on the efficacy of RIC.
远程缺血预处理(RIC)可使 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者获益。尽管进行了深入的研究,但 RIC 在临床实践中的应用仍然是一个挑战。这可能至少部分归因于混杂因素,这些因素可能会改变 RIC 的疗效。本综述重点关注心血管危险因素、合并症、药物使用和程序变量,这些因素可能会改变 STEMI 患者 RIC 的疗效。这些疗效修饰剂的研究结果基于亚组和事后分析,因此存在 I 型和 II 型错误的风险。尽管评估影响因素的研究结果往往存在不确定性,但并非所有研究都表明,吸烟、不使用他汀类药物、梗死部位、梗死相关区域、术前心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)血流、缺血持续时间和梗死相关动脉的侧支循环血流可能会影响 RIC 的心脏保护作用。正在进行的 CONDI2/ERIC-PPCI 试验的结果将确定 RIC 在 STEMI 患者治疗中的任何临床意义,而预设的亚组分析将进一步深入了解影响 RIC 疗效的因素。