Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, 1 Myddelton Street, London EC1R 1UB, UK.
Department of Women's Health, School of Life Course Science, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, North Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital London, London SE1 7EH, UK; Present affiliation: School of Health, Sport and Bioscience, College of Applied Health and Communities, University of East London, Water Lane, London E15 4LZ, UK.
Midwifery. 2019 Oct;77:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
Alongside midwifery units (AMUs) are managed by midwives and proximate to obstetric units (OUs), offering a home-like birth environment for women with straightforward pregnancies. They support physiological birth, with fast access to medical care if needed. AMUs have good perinatal outcomes and lower rates of interventions than OUs. In England, uptake remains lower than potential use, despite recent changes in policy to support their use. This article reports on experiences of access from a broader study that investigated AMU organisation and care.
Organisational case studies in four National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, selected for variation geographically and in features of their midwifery units. Fieldwork (December 2011 to October 2012) included observations (>100 h); semi-structured interviews with staff, managers and stakeholders (n = 89) and with postnatal women and partners (n = 47), on which this paper reports. Data were analysed thematically using NVivo10 software.
Women, partners and families felt welcome and valued in the AMU. They were drawn to the AMUs' environment, philosophy and approach to technology, including pain management. Access for some was hindered by inconsistent information about the existence, environment and safety of AMUs, and barriers to admission in early labour.
Key barriers to AMUs arise through inequitable information and challenges with admission in early labour. Most women still give birth in obstetric units and despite increases in the numbers of women birthing on AMUs since 2010, addressing these barriers will be essential to future scale-up.
助产士单位(AMU)由助产士管理,毗邻产科单位(OU),为妊娠正常的妇女提供类似家庭的分娩环境。它们支持生理分娩,如果需要,可快速获得医疗护理。AMU 的围产期结局良好,干预率低于 OU。尽管最近的政策变化支持其使用,但在英国,其利用率仍低于潜在使用率。本文报道了一项更广泛研究的访问经验,该研究调查了 AMU 的组织和护理。
在英格兰的四个国家卫生服务(NHS)信托中进行组织案例研究,这些信托在地理位置和助产单位的特点上存在差异。实地工作(2011 年 12 月至 2012 年 10 月)包括观察(>100 小时);与员工、管理人员和利益相关者(n=89)以及与产后妇女和伴侣(n=47)进行半结构化访谈,本文报告了这些访谈的结果。使用 NVivo10 软件对数据进行主题分析。
妇女、伴侣和家庭在 AMU 感到受欢迎和重视。他们被 AMU 的环境、理念和技术方法所吸引,包括疼痛管理。由于对 AMU 的存在、环境和安全性以及早期分娩时入院的障碍的信息不一致,一些人受到阻碍。
AMU 的主要障碍源于不公平的信息和早期分娩时入院的挑战。大多数妇女仍在产科单位分娩,尽管自 2010 年以来在 AMU 分娩的妇女人数有所增加,但解决这些障碍对于未来的扩大规模至关重要。