• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泰国低至中度风险ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者早期与延迟冠状动脉介入治疗的心血管结局:一项随机试验

Cardiovascular outcomes of early versus delayed coronary intervention in low to intermediate-risk patients with STEMI in Thailand: a randomised trial.

作者信息

Chotechuang Yotsawee, Phrommintikul Arintaya, Kuanprasert Srun, Muenpa Roungtiva, Patumanond Jayanton, Chaichuen Tuanchai, Sukonthasarn Apichard

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Department of Internal Medicine, Lampang Hospital, Lampang, Thailand.

出版信息

Heart Asia. 2019 Jun 12;11(2):e011201. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2019-011201. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/heartasia-2019-011201
PMID:31275432
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6579563/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefit of an early coronary intervention after streptokinase (SK) therapy in low to intermediate-risk patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) still remains uncertain. The current study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes of early versus delayed coronary intervention in low to intermediate-risk patients with STEMI after successful therapy with SK.

METHODS

We randomly assigned low to intermediate Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score to patients with STEMI who had successful treatment with full-dose SK at Lampang Hospital and Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital into early and delayed coronary intervention groups. The primary endpoints were 30-day and 6-month composite cardiovascular outcomes (death, rehospitalised with acute coronary syndrome, rehospitalised with heart failure and stroke).

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-two patients were included in our study. At the 30 days, composite cardiovascular outcomes were 4.9% in the early coronary intervention group and 2.5% in the delayed group (p=0.682). At the 6 months, the composite cardiovascular outcomes were 16.1% in the early group and 6.2% in the delayed group (p=0.054).

CONCLUSIONS

The delayed coronary intervention (>24 hours) in low to intermediate STEMI after successful therapy with SK did not increase in short and long-term cardiovascular events compared with an early coronary intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02131103.

摘要

背景

对于低至中度风险的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者,在链激酶(SK)治疗后进行早期冠状动脉介入治疗的益处仍不确定。本研究旨在评估低至中度风险的STEMI患者在SK成功治疗后,早期与延迟冠状动脉介入治疗的心血管结局。

方法

我们将兰邦医院和清迈玛哈拉吉那空医院接受全剂量SK成功治疗的STEMI患者,根据全球急性冠状动脉事件注册风险评分随机分为低至中度风险组,再分为早期和延迟冠状动脉介入治疗组。主要终点是30天和6个月时的复合心血管结局(死亡、因急性冠状动脉综合征再次住院、因心力衰竭再次住院和中风)。

结果

我们的研究纳入了162例患者。在30天时,早期冠状动脉介入治疗组的复合心血管结局为4.9%,延迟组为2.5%(p = 0.682)。在6个月时,早期组的复合心血管结局为16.1%,延迟组为6.2%(p = 0.054)。

结论

与早期冠状动脉介入治疗相比,低至中度STEMI患者在SK成功治疗后延迟冠状动脉介入治疗(>24小时)并未增加短期和长期心血管事件。

试验注册号

NCT02131103。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2dd/6579563/f3d175ea6f04/heartasia-2019-011201f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2dd/6579563/39315c1579cf/heartasia-2019-011201f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2dd/6579563/f3d175ea6f04/heartasia-2019-011201f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2dd/6579563/39315c1579cf/heartasia-2019-011201f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2dd/6579563/f3d175ea6f04/heartasia-2019-011201f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Cardiovascular outcomes of early versus delayed coronary intervention in low to intermediate-risk patients with STEMI in Thailand: a randomised trial.泰国低至中度风险ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者早期与延迟冠状动脉介入治疗的心血管结局:一项随机试验
Heart Asia. 2019 Jun 12;11(2):e011201. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2019-011201. eCollection 2019.
2
GRACE score and cardiovascular outcomes prediction among the delayed coronary intervention after post-fibrinolytic STEMI patients in a limited PCI-capable hospital.在一家具备有限PCI能力的医院中,对接受溶栓治疗后的STEMI患者进行延迟冠状动脉介入治疗时,GRACE评分与心血管结局预测
Open Heart. 2020 Mar 18;7(1):e001133. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001133. eCollection 2020.
3
The prognostic utility of GRACE risk score in predictive cardiovascular event rate in STEMI patients with successful fibrinolysis and delay intervention in non PCI-capable hospital: a retrospective cohort study.GRACE风险评分对非PCI能力医院中成功溶栓及延迟干预的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者心血管事件发生率的预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0383-3.
4
Complete versus culprit-only revascularisation in ST elevation myocardial infarction with multi-vessel disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变时完全血运重建与仅罪犯血管血运重建的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 3;5(5):CD011986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011986.pub2.
5
[Comparison of the predictive value of the modified CADILLAC, GRACE and TIMI risk scores for the risk of short-term death in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention].[改良CADILLAC、GRACE和TIMI风险评分对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后短期死亡风险的预测价值比较]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Mar;35(3):299-304. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220727-00696.
6
Underestimated and under-recognized: the late consequences of acute coronary syndrome (GRACE UK-Belgian Study).被低估和未被充分认识到的:急性冠脉综合征的晚期后果(GRACE UK-比利时研究)。
Eur Heart J. 2010 Nov;31(22):2755-64. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq326. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
7
Differences in Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Among Older Patients With ST-Elevation Versus Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Angiographically Proven Coronary Artery Disease.经血管造影证实患有冠状动脉疾病的老年ST段抬高型与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的短期和长期预后差异。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Sep;9(5):513-22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002312. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
8
Early versus late delayed percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者早期与晚期延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Jun;35(6):1317-1324. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02417-8. Epub 2023 May 12.
9
Early reperfusion and late clinical outcomes in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction randomly assigned to primary percutaneous coronary intervention or streptokinase.随机分配接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或链激酶治疗的急性心肌梗死患者的早期再灌注及晚期临床结局
Am Heart J. 2003 Dec;146(6):E22. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00424-1.
10
Randomized comparison of pre-hospital-initiated facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction very early after symptom onset: the LIPSIA-STEMI trial (Leipzig immediate prehospital facilitated angioplasty in ST-segment myocardial infarction).症状发作后极早期行院前启动的辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗治疗急性心肌梗死的随机比较:LIPSIA-STEMI 试验(莱比锡即刻院前辅助 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死血管成形术)
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun;4(6):605-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.01.013.

引用本文的文献

1
The assessment of no-reflow phenomenon incidence in early versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention following a primary fibrinolysis.在初次溶栓后早期与延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中无复流现象发生率的评估。
ARYA Atheroscler. 2024 Mar-Apr;20(2):31-40. doi: 10.48305/arya.2024.42104.2921.
2
[Reply yo the letter to the editor : "Keeping an eye on the pharmacoinvasive strategy"].[回复给编辑的信:“关注药物侵入性策略”] (注:原标题中“Reply yo”应改为“Reply to”)
Arch Peru Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2024 Jun 24;5(2):e368. doi: 10.47487/apcyccv.v5i2.368.. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
The prognostic utility of GRACE risk score in predictive cardiovascular event rate in STEMI patients with successful fibrinolysis and delay intervention in non PCI-capable hospital: a retrospective cohort study.GRACE风险评分对非PCI能力医院中成功溶栓及延迟干预的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者心血管事件发生率的预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0383-3.
2
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Transient and Persistent No Reflow Phenomena following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后短暂性和持续性无复流现象的长期临床结局
Korean Circ J. 2016 Jul;46(4):490-8. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.4.490. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
Routine invasive management early after fibrinolysis: relationship between baseline risk and treatment effects in a pooled patient-level analysis of 7 randomized controlled trials.溶栓后早期常规有创性管理:7 项随机对照试验患者水平汇总分析中基线风险与治疗效果的关系。
Am Heart J. 2014 Nov;168(5):757-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.07.027. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
4
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).2014年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)心肌血运重建特别工作组编写,欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)提供特别贡献。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
5
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理指南:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2013 Jan 29;127(4):e362-425. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742cf6. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
6
ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation.ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理的欧洲心脏病学会指南
Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2569-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
7
Thai Registry in Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRACS)--an extension of Thai Acute Coronary Syndrome registry (TACS) group: lower in-hospital but still high mortality at one-year.泰国急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究(TRACS)——泰国急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究(TACS)组的扩展:住院死亡率较低,但1年死亡率仍较高。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Apr;95(4):508-18.
8
2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南。美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组及心血管造影和介入学会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):e44-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
9
Relationship between risk stratification at admission and treatment effects of early invasive management following fibrinolysis: insights from the Trial of Routine ANgioplasty and Stenting After Fibrinolysis to Enhance Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TRANSFER-AMI).溶栓后常规血管成形术和支架置入与增强急性心肌梗死再灌注的临床试验(TRANSFER-AMI):发病时危险分层与溶栓后早期侵入性管理治疗效果的关系。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Aug;32(16):1994-2002. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr008. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
10
Routine early coronary angioplasty versus ischaemia-guided angioplasty after thrombolysis in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.常规早期冠状动脉成形术与溶栓后急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死缺血指导的冠状动脉成形术比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Apr;32(8):972-82. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq398. Epub 2010 Oct 28.