Anderson Collin R, Lueckler Jennifer, Olson Jared A
Clinical Manager, Department of Pharmacy, Intermountain Healthcare Primary Children's Hospital. Salt Lake City, UT (United States).
Clinical Dietitian, Intermountain Healthcare Primary Children's Hospital. Salt Lake City, UT (United States).
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2019 Apr-Jun;17(2):1416. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.2.1416. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
Lack of benefit and potential harm of early parenteral nutrition (PN) initiation in critically ill children was highlighted in the 2016 published results of a large multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
The purpose of this project was to implement a process to delay PN initiation for up to five days after admission to our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
Patients greater than thirty days of age, admitted to the PICU beginning July 1, 2016 were included in the analysis of the healthcare improvement initiative to decrease early PN initiation. A meeting was held with PICU fellows, attending physicians, dietitians, and pharmacists to reach a consensus to delay initiation of parenteral nutrition until PICU day five. The dietitian, with pharmacist support, reiterated recommendations on rounds and in formal notes.
A total of 2333 patients were identified in the pre-intervention group and a total of 2491 patients in the post-intervention group. The percentage of patients receiving PN prior to day five within the PICU was 5.5% in the pre-intervention group versus 3.1% in the delayed PN group (p<0.001). PICU patients receiving PN less than or equal to three days decreased from 2.6% pre-intervention to 1.5% post-intervention (p=0.01). For the subset of patients who were initiated on PN after admission to the PICU, median PICU length of stay was 7 days versus 6 days in the pre-intervention versus post-intervention group (p=0.26).
Decrease in PN utilization was seen in the pre and post-intervention groups as assessed by percentage of patients initiated on PN prior to day five of PICU admission. Consensus among practitioners with consistent recommendations from the frontline dietitian and pharmacist, with nutrition support team collaboration, contributed to the evidence based quality initiative results. Delaying PN did not adversely affect length of stay pre versus post-intervention.
2016年发表的一项大型多中心随机对照试验结果强调了危重症儿童早期肠外营养(PN)起始缺乏益处及潜在危害。
本项目的目的是实施一个流程,将PN起始推迟至儿科重症监护病房(PICU)入院后长达五天。
纳入2016年7月1日起入住PICU的30日龄以上患者,以分析减少早期PN起始的医疗改进举措。与PICU住院医师、主治医师、营养师和药剂师召开会议,达成共识,将肠外营养起始推迟至PICU第5天。营养师在药剂师支持下,在查房和正式记录中重申建议。
干预前组共识别出2333例患者,干预后组共2491例患者。PICU内第5天前接受PN的患者百分比,干预前组为5.5%,延迟PN组为3.1%(p<0.001)。接受PN少于或等于三天的PICU患者从干预前的2.6%降至干预后的1.5%(p=0.01)。对于入住PICU后开始接受PN的患者亚组,干预前组PICU中位住院时间为7天,干预后组为6天(p=0.26)。
根据PICU入院第5天前开始接受PN的患者百分比评估,干预前组和干预后组PN使用率均下降。从业者之间的共识以及一线营养师和药剂师一致的建议,加上营养支持团队的协作,促成了基于证据的质量改进举措的结果。推迟PN对干预前后的住院时间没有不利影响。