Nephrology Division, Hospital do Rim, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Infectious Diseases Division, Hospital do Rim, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Transpl Int. 2019 Nov;32(11):1127-1143. doi: 10.1111/tri.13478. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
The optimal immunosuppressive regimen for recipients of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys has not been identified. In this single-center study, 171 recipients of ECD kidney transplants were randomized to receive antithymocyte globulin induction, and delayed introduction of reduced dose tacrolimus, prednisone and everolimus (r-ATG/EVR, n = 88), or mycophenolate (r-ATG/MPS, n = 83). No cytomegalovirus (CMV) pharmacological prophylaxis was used. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CMV infection/disease at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included treatment failure [first biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, or death] and safety. Patients treated with EVR showed a 89% risk reduction (13.6 vs. 71.6%; HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.220, P < 0.001) in the incidence of first CMV infection/disease. Incidences of BPAR (16% vs. 5%, P = 0.021), graft loss (11% vs. 1%, P = 0.008), death (10% vs. 1%, P = 0.013), and treatment discontinuation (40% vs. 28%, P = 0.12) were higher in the r-ATG/EVR, leading to premature study termination. Mean glomerular filtration rate was lower in r-ATG/EVR (31.8 ± 18.8 vs. 42.6 ± 14.9, P < 0.001). In recipients of ECD kidney transplants receiving no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis, the use of everolimus was associated with higher treatment failure compared with mycophenolate despite the significant reduction in the incidence of CMV infection/disease (ClinicalTrials.gov.NCT01895049).
对于接受扩展标准供体(ECD)肾脏移植的患者,尚未确定最佳的免疫抑制治疗方案。在这项单中心研究中,171 例 ECD 肾移植受者随机分为两组:接受抗胸腺细胞球蛋白诱导,延迟引入低剂量他克莫司、泼尼松和依维莫司(r-ATG/EVR,n=88),或霉酚酸酯(r-ATG/MPS,n=83)。未使用巨细胞病毒(CMV)药物预防。主要终点是 12 个月时 CMV 感染/疾病的发生率。次要终点包括治疗失败[首次活检证实的急性排斥反应(BPAR)、移植物丢失或死亡]和安全性。接受依维莫司治疗的患者,首次 CMV 感染/疾病的发生率降低了 89%(13.6% vs. 71.6%;HR 0.11,95%CI 0.06-0.220,P<0.001)。r-ATG/EVR 组发生 BPAR(16% vs. 5%,P=0.021)、移植物丢失(11% vs. 1%,P=0.008)、死亡(10% vs. 1%,P=0.013)和治疗中断(40% vs. 28%,P=0.12)的比例更高,导致研究提前终止。r-ATG/EVR 组的平均肾小球滤过率较低(31.8±18.8 vs. 42.6±14.9,P<0.001)。在未接受 CMV 药物预防的 ECD 肾移植受者中,与霉酚酸酯相比,依维莫司的使用虽然显著降低了 CMV 感染/疾病的发生率,但导致治疗失败的风险更高(ClinicalTrials.gov.NCT01895049)。