Department of surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;45(11):2180-2187. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.032. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
Whereas distal cholangiocarcinoma (DC) is treated by pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), consensus is lacking on treatment of mid-bile duct carcinoma (mid-BDC) without involvement of the pancreatic head. Both PD or a local resection (LR) of the extrahepatic bile duct with lymphadenectomy are being used. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after PD and LR for mid-BDC and, for reference, PD for DC.
Retrospective monocenter study including consecutive patients who underwent LR for mid-BDC (LR), PD for mid-BDC (PD-mid) and PD for DC (PD-distal) between 2000 and 2016. Clinicopathologic characteristics, postoperative outcomes and survival were compared.
A total of 184 patients were included (LR, 22; PD-mid, 38; PD-distal, 124). Postoperative mortality was 0% following LR, 5% (2/22) for PD-mid and 3% (4/124) for PD-distal, p = 0.542. Major complications occurred in 5/22 patients (23%), 19/39 (50%) and 46/124 (37%) respectively, p = 0.103 (LR versus PD-mid, p = 0.038). Tumor size, differentiation grade and resection margin status were comparable across groups. Median number of resected lymph nodes was 5 (range 3-7), 9 (7-14) and 12 (8-16) respectively, p < 0.001. Median overall survival was 46 months (95%CI 10-82), 19 months. (95%CI 11-27), and 29 months (95%CI 23-35) respectively, p = 0.39 (LR versus PD-mid, p = 0.20). Disease-free survival also did not differ.
LR is an acceptable treatment for selected patients with mid-BDC, showing less morbidity and comparable survival despite smaller lymph node retrieval.
远端胆管癌(DC)的治疗方法是胰十二指肠切除术(PD),而对于未累及胰头部的中胆管癌(mid-BDC),尚无共识治疗方法。目前,PD 或肝外胆管局部切除术(LR)联合淋巴结清扫术均在使用。本研究旨在比较 PD 和 LR 治疗 mid-BDC 的效果,并参考 PD 治疗 DC 的效果。
本研究为回顾性单中心研究,纳入 2000 年至 2016 年间接受 LR 治疗 mid-BDC(LR 组)、PD 治疗 mid-BDC(PD-mid 组)和 PD 治疗 DC(PD-distal 组)的连续患者。比较了临床病理特征、术后结局和生存情况。
共纳入 184 例患者(LR 组 22 例,PD-mid 组 38 例,PD-distal 组 124 例)。LR 组术后无死亡病例,PD-mid 组为 5%(2/22),PD-distal 组为 3%(4/124),p=0.542。LR 组 5 例(23%)、PD-mid 组 19 例(50%)和 PD-distal 组 46 例(37%)患者发生重大并发症,p=0.103(LR 组与 PD-mid 组,p=0.038)。各组肿瘤大小、分化程度和切缘状态无差异。LR 组、PD-mid 组和 PD-distal 组的中位淋巴结切除数分别为 5(3-7)、9(7-14)和 12(8-16)个,p<0.001。LR 组、PD-mid 组和 PD-distal 组的中位总生存时间分别为 46 个月(95%CI 10-82)、19 个月(95%CI 11-27)和 29 个月(95%CI 23-35),p=0.39(LR 组与 PD-mid 组,p=0.20)。无病生存也无差异。
LR 是治疗中胆管癌的一种可接受的方法,尽管淋巴结取样较少,但手术发病率较低,生存情况相当。