Huo Ping, Luo Qiuyan, Li Juan, Jiao Baoquan, Rong Limin, Zhang Jie, Wu Xiaohua
Department of Reproductive Genetics, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, P.R. China.
Department of Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Amcare Women and Children's Hospital, Tianjin 300381, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Jul;18(1):711-721. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7625. Epub 2019 May 29.
Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) may be used as a mid-pregnancy test to confirm the diagnosis of common fetal aneuploidies, but its use is controversial. The present study aimed to determine the value of QF-PCR for diagnostic confirmation of karyotyping and the impact of parental origin and meiosis stage on the detected aneuploidy. The present prospective cohort study included pregnant women (age, 21-45 years; gestational age, 17-25 weeks) who consulted between May 2015 and December 2016. Women were screened and only consecutive high-risk individuals were included (n=428). QF-PCR analysis of amniocytes was performed. Karyotype analysis was considered the gold standard. Parental karyotyping was performed if the embryo exhibited any aneuploidy. GeneMapper 3.2 was used for data analysis. There were no false-negative or false-positive QF-PCR results, with 100% concordance with the karyotype. The aneuploidy distribution (n=105) was 68.6% for trisomy 21, 19.0% for trisomy 18, 7.6% for sex chromosome aneuploidy, 3.8% for trisomy 13 and 1.0% for 48,XXX,+18. Regarding trisomy 21, most cases (86.1%) were of maternal origin, 8.3% paternal and 6.5% undefined. Trisomy 18 was 88.2% maternal and 11.8% paternal. Maternal meiosis stage errors in trisomy 21 mainly occurred in meiosis I, while the origin of trisomy 18 exhibited similar proportions between meiosis I and II. The combination of non-invasive pre-natal testing and QF-PCR may become a rapid and effective method for fetal aneuploidy detection. QF-PCR may provide more genetic information for clinical diagnosis and treatment than karyotyping alone.
定量荧光聚合酶链反应(QF-PCR)可作为孕中期检测手段,用于确诊常见胎儿非整倍体疾病,但其应用存在争议。本研究旨在确定QF-PCR在核型分析诊断确认中的价值,以及亲代来源和减数分裂阶段对检测到的非整倍体的影响。本前瞻性队列研究纳入了2015年5月至2016年12月期间前来咨询的孕妇(年龄21 - 45岁;孕周17 - 25周)。对孕妇进行筛查,仅纳入连续的高危个体(n = 428)。对羊膜细胞进行QF-PCR分析。核型分析被视为金标准。若胚胎出现任何非整倍体情况,则进行亲代核型分析。使用GeneMapper 3.2进行数据分析。QF-PCR结果无假阴性或假阳性,与核型完全一致。非整倍体分布情况(n = 105)为:21三体占68.6%,18三体占19.0%,性染色体非整倍体占7.6%,13三体占3.8%,48,XXX,+18占1.0%。关于21三体,大多数病例(86.1%)源于母体,8.3%源于父体,6.5%来源不明。18三体中,88.2%源于母体,11.8%源于父体。21三体中母体减数分裂阶段错误主要发生在减数分裂I期,而18三体的起源在减数分裂I期和II期的比例相似。无创产前检测与QF-PCR相结合可能成为一种快速有效的胎儿非整倍体检测方法。与单独的核型分析相比,QF-PCR可为临床诊断和治疗提供更多遗传信息。