Lacorn Markus, Weiss Thomas, Wehling Paul, Arlinghaus Mark, Scherf Katharina
R-Biopharm AG, An der neuen Bergstraße 17, Darmstadt 64297, Germany.
Medallion Labs, 9000 Plymouth Avenue North, Minneapolis, MN 55427.
J AOAC Int. 2019 Sep 1;102(5):1535-1543. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.19-0094. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
Since its introduction to the analytical community, the R5 method to quantify gluten led to a strong improvement of the situation for the food industry and celiac patients. During recent years, some questions arose on the use of the Codex Alimentarius factor of two to convert from prolamins to gluten, an overestimation of rye and barley, inadequate detection of glutelins, and the inhomogeneous distribution of gluten in oats. These limitations of the R5 method, especially when measuring oat samples, led to AOAC (SMPR®) 2017.021, which was approved by stakeholders in 2017. Objective: We present a collaborative study of a method for the quantitative analysis of wheat, rye, and barley gluten in oat and oat products using a sandwich ELISA that is based on four different monoclonal antibodies including the R5 monoclonal anitbody. The sandwich ELISA detects intact gliadins and related prolamins from rye and barley, high-molecular-weight (HMW) glutenin subunits (GS) from wheat, HMW secalins from rye, and low-molecular-weight (LMW) GS from wheat. It does not detect D-hordeins from barley. Samples are extracted by Cocktail solution, subsequently followed by 80% ethanol, and analyzed within 50 min. The measurement range is between 5 and 80 mg/kg gluten using a calibrator made out of a gluten extract from four different wheat cultivars. The results of the collaborative test with 19 participating laboratories showed recoveries ranging from 99 to 137% for all three grain sources. Relative reproducibility SDs for samples >10 mg/kg gluten ranged from 10 to 53%. The collaborative study results confirmed that the method is accurate and suitable to measure gluten from all three grain sources and has demonstrated performance on oat matrices, which meets the criteria as specified in SMPR 2017.021. Data from in-house validation experiments are available as Annex B to this publication.
自从R5方法引入分析领域以来,用于定量检测麸质的该方法极大地改善了食品行业和乳糜泻患者的状况。近年来,在使用食品法典委员会规定的2倍系数将醇溶蛋白换算为麸质、黑麦和大麦的高估、谷蛋白检测不足以及燕麦中麸质分布不均等方面出现了一些问题。R5方法的这些局限性,尤其是在检测燕麦样品时,催生了AOAC(SMPR®)2017.021,该方法于2017年获得利益相关者批准。目的:我们开展了一项协作研究,采用基于四种不同单克隆抗体(包括R5单克隆抗体)的夹心酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA),对燕麦及燕麦制品中的小麦、黑麦和大麦麸质进行定量分析。该夹心ELISA可检测完整的醇溶蛋白以及来自黑麦和大麦的相关醇溶蛋白、来自小麦的高分子量(HMW)麦谷蛋白亚基(GS)、来自黑麦的HMW黑麦碱以及来自小麦的低分子量(LMW)GS。它无法检测大麦中的D-大麦醇溶蛋白。样品先用混合溶液提取,随后用80%乙醇提取,并在50分钟内进行分析。使用由四个不同小麦品种的麸质提取物制成的校准品,测量范围为5至80 mg/kg麸质。与19个参与实验室进行的协作测试结果表明,所有三种谷物来源的回收率在99%至137%之间。麸质含量>10 mg/kg的样品的相对重现性标准差在10%至53%之间。协作研究结果证实,该方法准确且适用于检测所有三种谷物来源的麸质,并已在燕麦基质上展示了性能,符合SMPR 2017.021规定的标准。内部验证实验的数据可作为本出版物的附件B获取。