Department of Otolaryngology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642,
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, and.
J Neurosci. 2019 Aug 28;39(35):6879-6887. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0038-19.2019. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
Speech intelligibility can vary dramatically between individuals with similar clinically defined severity of hearing loss based on the audiogram. These perceptual differences, despite equal audiometric-threshold elevation, are often assumed to reflect central-processing variations. Here, we compared peripheral-processing in auditory nerve (AN) fibers of male chinchillas between two prevalent hearing loss etiologies: metabolic hearing loss (MHL) and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). MHL results from age-related reduction of the endocochlear potential due to atrophy of the stria vascularis. MHL in the present study was induced using furosemide, which provides a validated model of age-related MHL in young animals by reversibly inhibiting the endocochlear potential. Effects of MHL on peripheral processing were assessed using Wiener-kernel (system identification) analyses of single AN fiber responses to broadband noise, for direct comparison to previously published AN responses from animals with NIHL. Wiener-kernel analyses show that even mild NIHL causes grossly abnormal coding of low-frequency stimulus components. In contrast, for MHL the same abnormal coding was only observed with moderate to severe loss. For equal sensitivity loss, coding impairment was substantially less severe with MHL than with NIHL, probably due to greater preservation of the tip-to-tail ratio of cochlear frequency tuning with MHL compared with NIHL rather than different intrinsic AN properties. Differences in peripheral neural coding between these two pathologies-the more severe of which, NIHL, is preventable-likely contribute to individual speech perception differences. Our results underscore the need to minimize noise overexposure and for strategies to personalize diagnosis and treatment for individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. Differences in speech perception ability between individuals with similar clinically defined severity of hearing loss are often assumed to reflect central neural-processing differences. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that peripheral neural processing of complex sounds differs dramatically between the two most common etiologies of hearing loss. Greater processing impairment with noise-induced compared with an age-related (metabolic) hearing loss etiology may explain heightened speech perception difficulties in people overexposed to loud environments. These results highlight the need for public policies to prevent noise-induced hearing loss, an entirely avoidable hearing loss etiology, and for personalized strategies to diagnose and treat sensorineural hearing loss.
言语可懂度在听力损失程度相似的个体之间差异很大,这种差异基于听力图。尽管听力阈值相等,但这些感知差异通常被认为反映了中枢处理的变化。在这里,我们比较了两种常见听力损失病因(代谢性听力损失和噪声性听力损失)雄性南美栗鼠的听神经(AN)纤维的外周处理。代谢性听力损失是由于血管纹萎缩导致的内淋巴电位的年龄相关性下降引起的。本研究中的代谢性听力损失是使用速尿诱导的,它通过可逆地抑制内淋巴电位,为年轻动物提供了一种与年龄相关的代谢性听力损失的验证模型。使用宽带噪声对单个 AN 纤维反应的 Wiener 核(系统识别)分析来评估代谢性听力损失对外周处理的影响,以便与以前发表的噪声性听力损失动物的 AN 反应进行直接比较。Wiener 核分析表明,即使是轻度的噪声性听力损失也会导致低频刺激成分的编码严重异常。相比之下,对于代谢性听力损失,只有在中度至重度损失时才会观察到相同的异常编码。对于相同的敏感性损失,编码损伤在代谢性听力损失中比噪声性听力损失中要严重得多,这可能是由于与噪声性听力损失相比,代谢性听力损失中耳蜗频率调谐的尖端到尾巴的比例保持得更好,而不是内在的 AN 特性不同。这两种病理之间的外周神经编码差异——其中更严重的噪声性听力损失是可以预防的——可能导致个体言语感知差异。我们的结果强调了需要最大限度地减少噪声过度暴露,并制定个性化诊断和治疗策略,以满足感音神经性听力损失患者的需求。言语感知能力在听力损失程度相似的个体之间的差异通常被认为反映了中枢神经处理的差异。在这里,我们首次证明,在两种最常见的听力损失病因之间,复杂声音的外周神经处理差异很大。与年龄相关(代谢性)听力损失病因相比,噪声性听力损失的处理损伤更大,这可能解释了在暴露于强噪声环境的人群中言语感知困难程度更高的原因。这些结果强调了需要制定公共政策来预防噪声性听力损失,这是一种完全可以预防的听力损失病因,以及制定个性化策略来诊断和治疗感音神经性听力损失。