Recent studies suggest that a centro-parietal positivity (CPP) in the EEG signal tracks the absolute (unsigned) strength of accumulated evidence for choices that require the integration of noisy sensory input. Here, we investigated whether the CPP might also reflect the evidence for decisions based on a quantitative comparison between two sequentially presented stimuli (a signed quantity). We recorded EEG while participants decided whether the latter of two vibrotactile frequencies was higher or lower than the former in six variants of this task (n = 116). To account for biases in sequential comparisons, we applied a behavioral model based on Bayesian inference that estimated subjectively perceived frequency differences. Immediately after the second stimulus, parietal ERPs reflected the signed value of subjectively perceived differences and afterwards their absolute value. Strikingly, the modulation by signed difference was evident in trials without any objective evidence for either choice and correlated with choice-selective premotor beta band amplitudes. Modulations by the absolute strength of subjectively perceived evidence - a direct indicator of task difficulty - exhibited all features of statistical decision confidence. Together, our data suggest that parietal EEG signals first index subjective evidence, and later include a measure of confidence in the context of perceptual decision making.