Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, 560029, India.
Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, 560029, India.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2019 Aug;44:13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
The prevalence of catatonia varies with the setting and type of rating scale used to measure catatonia. Catatonia, initially subsumed under schizophrenia, now is increasingly recognized in association with affective disorders.
We aimed to examine the prevalence of catatonia in an acute psychiatric inpatient unit in a tertiary center in India.
Study subjects (n = 300) were randomly selected from amongst the inpatients over one year and evaluated within 24 h of admission using BFCRS and NCS, besides a sociodemographic and clinical proforma. During the inpatient stay MINI PLUS 5.0 was applied.
Among 300 inpatients recruited, 88 (29.3%) demonstrated at least one catatonic sign in either of the rating scales. As per the diagnostic cut-offs defined by BFCRS and NCS, the prevalence of catatonia syndrome was 49 (16.3%) and 32 (10.6%) respectively. The prevalence rates as per ICD-10 criteria and DSM-5 criteria were 19% and 5.3% respectively. The two most frequently noted signs - staring and withdrawal, were not listed as signs in either the ICD-10 or DSM V. The prevalence of catatonic symptoms was different in psychotic disorders in contrast to affective disorders. Severity of catatonia was associated with younger age, lesser duration of primary illness and prior episodes of catatonia.
The prevalence of catatonia varies from 5.3% to 19% based on the criteria used. Identification warrants use of structured instruments. Catatonia is more severe in the initial years of illness, those with prior episodes of catatonia and in the younger age group.
使用不同的评定量表来测量紧张症,其发生率也有所不同,这与环境和评定量表的类型有关。紧张症最初被归入精神分裂症,但现在越来越多地与情感障碍有关。
我们旨在检查印度一家三级医院急性精神科住院患者中紧张症的发生率。
研究对象(n=300)是从一年以上的住院患者中随机选择的,并在入院后 24 小时内使用 BFCRS 和 NCS 以及社会人口统计学和临床表格进行评估。在住院期间应用 MINI PLUS 5.0。
在招募的 300 名住院患者中,88 名(29.3%)在任一评定量表中至少表现出一种紧张症体征。根据 BFCRS 和 NCS 定义的诊断截止值,紧张症综合征的患病率分别为 49 例(16.3%)和 32 例(10.6%)。根据 ICD-10 标准和 DSM-5 标准,患病率分别为 19%和 5.3%。刻板和退缩这两个最常被注意到的体征并没有被列入 ICD-10 或 DSM V。紧张症症状在精神病性障碍中的发生率与情感障碍不同。紧张症的严重程度与年龄较小、原发性疾病持续时间较短以及既往紧张症发作有关。
根据使用的标准,紧张症的患病率从 5.3%到 19%不等。识别需要使用结构化工具。在疾病的最初几年、既往有紧张症发作史以及年龄较小的患者中,紧张症更为严重。