Haeberle Lena, Esposito Irene
Institute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University and University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Germany.
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jun 27;4:50. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2019.06.02. eCollection 2019.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy and estimated to become the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths by 2030. Although overall 5-year survival rates have constantly remained below 10% for the last decades, several key points important for accurate patient stratification have emerged during recent years. These key points include a highly standardized gross examination of PDAC resection specimens, using an axial slicing technique and inking of the circumferential resection margin (CRM), as well as a meticulous microscopic examination, taking into account the prognostic relevance of factors such as the exact resection status (R0 R1 1-mm R1 resection), histopathological tumor grading and the so-called lymph node ratio (LNR). With increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy in PDAC, tumor regression grading (TRG) for PDAC is currently rising in relevance in order to stratify and manage pre-operatively treated PDAC patients. As all current TRG systems for PDAC are unsatisfactory, new standardized international protocols are urgently needed. Several morphological subtypes of PDAC exist, some of which share the same molecular background with classical PDAC, while others are characterized by a distinct molecular pathogenesis. While some show a prognosis similar to classical PDAC, other subtypes stand out due to a better or even worse prognosis than classical PDAC. Prognostic relevant molecular subtypes of PDAC have been proposed as well, however, limitations of used cohorts and the lacking correlation of molecular subtypes with histomorphological subtypes limit the translation of these findings into valuable clinical applications. Lastly, several macroscopic and microscopic precursor lesions of PDAC have been described in genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) and humans in recent times, providing further insight into PDAC carcinogenesis. In addition, improved diagnosis of PDAC precursors represents a chance to select patients for resection before invasive PDAC is present.
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是一种侵袭性很强的恶性肿瘤,预计到2030年将成为癌症相关死亡的第二大主要原因。尽管在过去几十年中总体5年生存率一直低于10%,但近年来出现了几个对准确患者分层很重要的关键点。这些关键点包括对PDAC切除标本进行高度标准化的大体检查,采用轴向切片技术并对环周切缘(CRM)进行墨染,以及进行细致的显微镜检查,同时考虑到诸如确切切除状态(R0、R1>1mm、R1切除)、组织病理学肿瘤分级和所谓的淋巴结比率(LNR)等因素的预后相关性。随着新辅助治疗在PDAC中使用的增加,PDAC的肿瘤退缩分级(TRG)目前在分层和管理术前治疗的PDAC患者方面的相关性正在上升。由于目前所有用于PDAC的TRG系统都不尽人意,因此迫切需要新的标准化国际方案。PDAC存在几种形态学亚型,其中一些与经典PDAC具有相同的分子背景,而其他亚型则具有独特的分子发病机制。虽然有些亚型的预后与经典PDAC相似,但其他亚型的预后比经典PDAC更好或更差。也有人提出了与PDAC预后相关的分子亚型,然而,所用队列的局限性以及分子亚型与组织形态学亚型缺乏相关性限制了这些发现转化为有价值的临床应用。最后,近年来在基因工程小鼠模型(GEMM)和人类中描述了几种PDAC的大体和显微镜下前驱病变,这为深入了解PDAC的致癌机制提供了进一步的线索。此外,改善PDAC前驱病变的诊断为在侵袭性PDAC出现之前选择患者进行切除提供了机会。