RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Pharmerit International, Bethesda, MD.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Oct 7;152(5):544-557. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz070.
Assess support for the effectiveness of two separate practices, restrictive transfusion strategy and computerized physician order entry/clinical decision support (CPOE/CDS) tools, in decreasing RBC transfusions in adult surgical and nonsurgical patients.
Following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Laboratory Medicine Best Practice (LMBP) Systematic Review (A-6) method, studies were assessed for quality and evidence of effectiveness in reducing the percentage of patients transfused and/or units of blood transfused.
Twenty-five studies on restrictive transfusion practice and seven studies on CPOE/CDS practice met LMBP inclusion criteria. The overall strength of the body of evidence of effectiveness for restrictive transfusion strategy and CPOE/CDS was rated as high.
Based on these procedures, adherence to an institutional restrictive transfusion strategy and use of CPOE/CDS tools for hemoglobin alerts or reminders of the institution's restrictive transfusion policies are effective in reducing RBC transfusion overuse.
评估两种独立实践(限制性输血策略和计算机化医嘱录入/临床决策支持(CPOE/CDS)工具)在减少成人外科和非外科患者红细胞输注方面的有效性。
根据疾病预防控制中心实验室医学最佳实践(LMBP)系统评价(A-6)方法,评估研究的质量和有效性证据,以减少输血患者的百分比和/或输血量。
符合 LMBP 纳入标准的有 25 项关于限制性输血实践的研究和 7 项关于 CPOE/CDS 实践的研究。对限制性输血策略和 CPOE/CDS 的有效性进行的整体证据强度评估为高。
基于这些程序,遵循机构的限制性输血策略和使用 CPOE/CDS 工具进行血红蛋白警报或提醒机构的限制性输血政策,可有效减少红细胞输注过度。