University of California, Davis.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2019 Aug 1;44(4):589-630. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7530813.
A decade after passage, a majority of Americans now support the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and Republican efforts to repeal it outright have failed. This article investigates whether the policy itself, through its beneficiaries, changed public opinion and sowed the seeds of its defense.
This study used an individual-level panel design to estimate the causal effect of implementation on opinion and electoral outcomes for ACA beneficiaries during the first year of open enrollment.
Individuals who enrolled in plans on the health insurance marketplaces had significantly more positive opinions of the ACA after implementation. Previously uninsured Medicaid enrollees also reported improved opinions, though results were not statistically significant. In contrast, uninsured individuals residing in states that did not expand Medicaid became significantly less supportive of the law. Changes in opinion persisted up to the 2014 midterm elections, and there is evidence that individuals with marketplace insurance became more supportive of Democratic candidates, although not more likely to vote for them.
Public support for the ACA was enhanced when its beneficiaries became more positive toward it during implementation. Recent changes to key ACA provisions have the potential to undermine the law's effectiveness, potentially leading to political action as benefits slowly begin to disappear.
平价医疗法案(ACA)通过十年后,现在大多数美国人都支持该法案,而共和党彻底废除该法案的努力也失败了。本文探讨了该政策本身是否通过其受益者改变了公众意见,并为其辩护埋下了种子。
本研究采用个体层面的面板设计,以估计在开放注册的第一年,实施对 ACA 受益者的意见和选举结果的因果效应。
在医疗保险市场上参保的个人在实施后对 ACA 的评价明显更为积极。此前未参保的医疗补助计划的参保者也报告称意见有所改善,但结果并不具有统计学意义。相比之下,在没有扩大医疗补助计划的州居住的未参保者对该法律的支持明显减少。意见的变化一直持续到 2014 年中期选举,有证据表明,有市场保险的个人对民主党候选人的支持度有所提高,尽管他们不太可能投票给他们。
当受益者在实施过程中对该法案更加积极时,公众对该法案的支持度得到了提高。最近对 ACA 关键条款的修改有可能削弱该法案的效力,随着福利的逐渐减少,可能会引发政治行动。