Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Urology. 2019 Nov;133:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.057. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
To evaluate the impact of frailty on adverse perioperative outcomes in patients treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.
We identified 9459 adults (age ≥18) in the Nationwide Readmission Database who underwent radical cystectomy in 2014 for bladder cancer. We defined patients' frailty status using Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining diagnosis indicator and compared in-hospital mortality, ICU-level complications, 30-day readmissions, nonhome discharge, length of hospitalization, and hospital-related costs between frail and nonfrail patients using χ tests. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of the primary outcomes of interest.
Of 9459 patients undergoing radical cystectomy, 7.1% (n = 673) met criteria. Frail patients were more likely than nonfrail patients to have comorbid conditions (68.2% vs 59.7%; P= .005), in-hospital mortality (4.2% vs 1.5%; P= .04), ICU-level complications (52.9% vs 18.6%; P<.001), nonhome discharge (33.9% vs 11.6%; P <.001), longer length of stay (median 15 vs 7 days; P<.001), and higher median cost of the index admission ($39,665 vs $27,307). Frailty was the strongest independent predictor of ICU-level complications, nonhome discharge, increased length of stay, and hospital-related costs of any covariate.
Frail patients receiving radical cystectomy were more likely than nonfrail patients to have adverse perioperative outcomes and higher odds of in-hospital mortality, ICU-level complications, nonhome discharge, increased length of stay, and hospital-related costs. Preoperative consideration of frailty may be useful in clinical guidance and shared decision-making.
评估衰弱对接受膀胱癌根治性切除术患者围手术期不良结局的影响。
我们在 2014 年全国再入院数据库中确定了 9459 名接受膀胱癌根治性切除术的成年人(年龄≥18 岁)。我们使用约翰霍普金斯调整临床组衰弱定义诊断指标来定义患者的衰弱状态,并使用 χ 检验比较虚弱和非虚弱患者的住院死亡率、重症监护病房并发症、30 天再入院率、非家庭出院率、住院时间和与医院相关的费用。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定主要研究结果的预测因素。
在 9459 名接受根治性膀胱切除术的患者中,7.1%(n=673)符合标准。虚弱患者比非虚弱患者更有可能合并疾病(68.2% vs 59.7%;P=.005)、住院死亡率(4.2% vs 1.5%;P=.04)、重症监护病房并发症(52.9% vs 18.6%;P<.001)、非家庭出院率(33.9% vs 11.6%;P<.001)、住院时间更长(中位数 15 天 vs 7 天;P<.001)和指数入院的中位费用更高(39665 美元 vs 27307 美元)。衰弱是重症监护病房并发症、非家庭出院、住院时间延长和与医院相关费用的任何协变量中最强的独立预测因素。
接受膀胱癌根治性切除术的虚弱患者比非虚弱患者更有可能出现围手术期不良结局,且更有可能出现住院死亡率、重症监护病房并发症、非家庭出院、住院时间延长和与医院相关费用增加。术前考虑衰弱情况可能有助于临床指导和共同决策。