Suppr超能文献

经口给予仔猪粉尘后增塑剂邻苯二甲酸酯和 DINCH 的生物利用度。

Bioavailability of phthalate and DINCH® plasticizers, after oral administration of dust to piglets.

机构信息

Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Department of Chemical Safety and Toxicology, D-80538, Munich, Germany.

Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Department of Chemical Safety and Toxicology, D-80538, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Toxicol Lett. 2019 Oct 10;314:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

Abstract

For decades, phthalates have been widely used as plasticizers in a large number of consumer products, leading to a complex exposure to humans via ingestion, inhalation or dermal uptake. Children may have a higher unintended dust intake per day compared to adults. Therefore, dust intake of children could pose a relevant exposure and subsequently a potential health risk. The aim of this study was to determine the relative bioavailability of certain phthalates, such as di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), di-isononyl phthalate (DINP) and the non-phthalate plasticizer diisononyl 1,2-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid (DINCH, Hexamoll), after ingestion of dust. Seven 5-week-old male piglets were fed five different dust samples collected from daycare centers. Overall, 0.43 g to 0.83 g of dust sieved to 63 μm were administered orally. The piglets' urine was collected over a period of 38 h. The excreted metabolites were quantified using an LC-MS/MS method. The mean uptake rates of the applied doses for DEHP, DINP, and DINCH were 43% ± 11%, 47% ± 26%, and 9% ± 3.5%, respectively. The metabolites of DEHP and DINP showed maximum concentrations in urine after three to five hours, whereas the metabolites of DINCH, reached maximum concentrations 24 h post-dose. The oral bioavailability of the investigated plasticizers was higher compared to the bioaccessibility reported from in vitro digestion tests. Furthermore, the bioavailability of DEHP did not vary substantially between the dust samples, whereas a dose-dependent saturation process for DINP was observed. In addition to other intake pathways, dust could be a source of plasticizers in children using the recent intake rates for dust ingestion.

摘要

几十年来,邻苯二甲酸酯被广泛用作大量消费品中的增塑剂,导致人类通过摄入、吸入或皮肤吸收而面临复杂的接触。与成年人相比,儿童每天可能会意外摄入更多的灰尘。因此,儿童的灰尘摄入量可能构成相关暴露,并随之带来潜在的健康风险。本研究旨在确定某些邻苯二甲酸酯(如邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)、邻苯二甲酸二异壬酯(DINP)和非邻苯二甲酸酯增塑剂二异壬基 1,2-环己烷二羧酸(DINCH,Hexamoll))在摄入灰尘后的相对生物利用度。7 只 5 周龄雄性小猪喂食了从日托中心采集的 5 种不同的灰尘样本。总共经口给予 0.43-0.83g 筛至 63μm 的灰尘。在 38 小时的时间段内收集小猪的尿液。采用 LC-MS/MS 方法定量分析排泄的代谢物。DEHP、DINP 和 DINCH 的应用剂量的平均吸收率分别为 43%±11%、47%±26%和 9%±3.5%。DEHP 和 DINP 的代谢物在三至五小时后尿液中达到最大浓度,而 DINCH 的代谢物在给药后 24 小时达到最大浓度。与体外消化试验报告的生物可及性相比,研究中增塑剂的口服生物利用度更高。此外,DEHP 的生物利用度在不同灰尘样本之间没有明显差异,而 DINP 则观察到剂量依赖性的饱和过程。除其他摄入途径外,灰尘可能是儿童摄入近期灰尘摄入量的增塑剂来源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验