Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Research Coordinating Center, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):638-650. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
To assess the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) or radiotherapy (AR) on the risk of recurrence in surgically treated patients with early-stage uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS).
We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases for publications up to March 2019, which compared patients with early-stage uLMS who received AC or AR with those who did not. The primary endpoint was recurrence rate. Random- or fixed-effects models were used for pooled estimates of the effect of adjuvant treatments on recurrence rates. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on study design, surgical staging, AC regimen (gemcitabine/docetaxel regimen), and type of AR.
Three randomized trials and 9 observational studies (9 studies for AC vs. observation, n = 496; 9 studies for AR vs. observation, n = 425) were included. The meta-analysis indicated that AC did not decrease the risk of recurrence compared with observation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.37-1.15, P = 0.14; P = 0.09 and I = 42.1). Similarly, AR did not decrease the risk of recurrence compared with observation (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.56-2.21, P = 0.76; P = 0.10 and I = 40.4). Meta-regression analyses revealed no significant association between median follow-up time and recurrence. In subgroup analyses (study design, surgical staging, gemcitabine/docetaxel regimen, type of AR), neither AC nor AR decreased the risk of recurrence significantly.
AC, including gemcitabine/docetaxel regimen, or AR did not reduce the recurrence rate in patients with early-stage uLMS.
评估辅助化疗(AC)或放疗(AR)对手术治疗的早期子宫平滑肌肉瘤(uLMS)患者复发风险的影响。
我们检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 MEDLINE 以及 Cochrane 数据库,截至 2019 年 3 月,比较了接受 AC 或 AR 治疗与未接受治疗的早期 uLMS 患者。主要终点是复发率。采用随机或固定效应模型对辅助治疗对复发率的影响进行汇总估计。根据研究设计、手术分期、AC 方案(吉西他滨/多西他赛方案)和 AR 类型进行亚组分析。
纳入了 3 项随机试验和 9 项观察性研究(AC 与观察比较,n=496;AR 与观察比较,n=425)。荟萃分析表明,与观察相比,AC 并未降低复发风险(比值比 [OR] = 0.65,95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.37-1.15,P = 0.14;P = 0.09,I² = 42.1)。同样,与观察相比,AR 并未降低复发风险(OR = 1.11,95% CI = 0.56-2.21,P = 0.76;P = 0.10,I² = 40.4)。Meta 回归分析显示,中位随访时间与复发之间无显著关联。在亚组分析(研究设计、手术分期、吉西他滨/多西他赛方案、AR 类型)中,AC 和 AR 均未显著降低复发风险。
AC(包括吉西他滨/多西他赛方案)或 AR 并未降低早期 uLMS 患者的复发率。