Suppr超能文献

采用上身分级运动试验测定和验证耐力训练男性的最大脂肪氧化。

Determination and validation of peak fat oxidation in endurance-trained men using an upper body graded exercise test.

机构信息

Xlab, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Center for Healthy Aging, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Clinical Research Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.

出版信息

Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Nov;29(11):1677-1690. doi: 10.1111/sms.13519. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

Abstract

Peak fat oxidation rate (PFO) and the intensity that elicits PFO (Fat ) are commonly determined by a validated graded exercise test (GE) on a cycling ergometer with indirect calorimetry. However, for upper body exercise fat oxidation rates are not well elucidated and no protocol has been validated. Thus, our aim was to test validity and inter-method reliability for determination of PFO and Fat in trained men using a GE protocol applying double poling on a ski-ergometer. PFO and Fat were assessed during two identical GE tests (GE1 and GE2) and validated against separated short continuous exercise bouts (SCE) at 35%, 50%, and 65% of V̇O on the ski-ergometer in 10 endurance-trained men (V̇O : 65.1 ± 1.0 mL·min ·kg , mean ± SEM). Between GE tests no differences were found in PFO (GE1: 0.42 ± 0.03; GE2: 0.45 ± 0.03 g·min , P = .256) or Fat (GE1: 41 ± 2%; GE2: 43 ± 3% of V̇O , P = .457) and the intra-individual coefficient of variation (CV) was 8 ± 2% and 11 ± 2% for PFO and Fat , respectively. Between GE and SCE tests, PFO (GE : 0.44 ± 0.03; SCE; 0.47 ± 0.06 g·min , P = .510) was not different, whereas a difference in Fat (GE : 42 ± 2%; SCE: 52 ± 4% of V̇O , P = .030) was observed with a CV of 17 ± 4% and 15 ± 4% for PFO and Fat , respectively. In conclusion, GE has a high day-to-day reliability in determination of PFO and Fat in trained men, whereas it is unclear if PFO and Fat determined by GE reflect continuous exercise in general.

摘要

峰值脂肪氧化率 (PFO) 和引起 PFO 的强度 (Fat) 通常通过在带有间接测热法的自行车测功仪上进行验证的分级运动测试 (GE) 来确定。然而,对于上半身运动,脂肪氧化率还没有得到很好的阐明,也没有经过验证的方案。因此,我们的目的是通过在滑雪测功仪上进行双极测试,在 10 名受过训练的男性中测试使用 GE 方案确定 PFO 和 Fat 的有效性和方法间可靠性。在两次相同的 GE 测试 (GE1 和 GE2) 中评估 PFO 和 Fat,并通过在滑雪测功仪上以 35%、50%和 65%的 V̇O 进行单独的短连续运动 (SCE) 进行验证,在 10 名耐力训练的男性中 (V̇O:65.1 ± 1.0 mL·min·kg,平均值 ± SEM)。在两次 GE 测试之间,PFO 没有差异 (GE1:0.42 ± 0.03;GE2:0.45 ± 0.03 g·min,P =.256) 或 Fat (GE1:41 ± 2%;GE2:43 ± 3%的 V̇O,P =.457),个体内变异系数 (CV) 分别为 PFO 和 Fat 的 8 ± 2%和 11 ± 2%。在 GE 和 SCE 测试之间,PFO (GE:0.44 ± 0.03;SCE:0.47 ± 0.06 g·min,P =.510) 没有差异,而 Fat 不同 (GE:42 ± 2%;SCE:52 ± 4%的 V̇O,P =.030),PFO 和 Fat 的 CV 分别为 17 ± 4%和 15 ± 4%。总之,GE 在确定训练有素的男性的 PFO 和 Fat 方面具有很高的日常可靠性,而 GE 确定的 PFO 和 Fat 是否反映一般的连续运动尚不清楚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验