Brown-Johnson Cati, Shaw Jonathan G, Safaeinili Nadia, Chan Garrett K, Mahoney Megan, Asch Steven, Winget Marcy
Evaluation Sciences Unit Stanford School of Medicine Stanford California.
Division of Primary Care and Population Health Stanford School of Medicine Stanford California.
Learn Health Syst. 2019 Feb 20;3(3):e10188. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10188. eCollection 2019 Jul.
Implementing team-based care into existing primary care is challenging; understanding facilitators and barriers to implementation is critical. We assessed adoption and acceptability of new roles in the first 6 months of launching a team-based care model focused on preventive care, population health, and psychosocial support.
We conducted qualitative rapid ethnography at a community-based test clinic, including 74 hours of observations and 28 semi-structured interviews. We identified implementation themes related to team-based care and specifically the integration of three roles purposively designed to enhance coordination for better patient outcomes, including preventive screening and mental health: (1) medical assistants as care coordinators; (2) extended care team specialists, including clinical pharmacist and behavioral health professional; and (3) advanced practice providers (APPs)-ie, nurse practitioners and physician assistants.
All stakeholders (ie, patients, providers, and staff) reported positive perceptions of care coordinators and extended care specialists; these roles were well defined and quickly implemented. Care coordinators effectively managed care between visits and established strong patient relationships. Specialist colocation facilitated patient access and well-supported diabetes services and mental health care. We also observed unanticipated value: Care coordinators relayed encounter-relevant chart information to providers while scribing; extended care specialists supported informal continuing medical education. In contrast, we observed uncertain definition and expectations of the APP role across stakeholders; accordingly, adoption and acceptability of the role varied.
Practice redesign can redistribute responsibility and patient connection throughout a team but should emphasize well-defined roles. Ethnography, conducted early in implementation with multistakeholder perspectives, can provide rapid and actionable insights about where roles may need refinement or redefinition to support ultimate physical and mental health outcomes for patients.
将基于团队的护理模式融入现有的初级护理中具有挑战性;了解实施过程中的促进因素和障碍至关重要。我们评估了一种基于团队的护理模式在启动后的前6个月里新角色的采用情况和可接受性,该模式侧重于预防保健、人群健康和心理社会支持。
我们在一家社区测试诊所进行了定性快速人种志研究,包括74小时的观察和28次半结构化访谈。我们确定了与基于团队的护理相关的实施主题,特别是三个旨在加强协调以实现更好患者结局的角色的整合,包括预防筛查和心理健康:(1)作为护理协调员的医疗助理;(2)扩展护理团队专家,包括临床药剂师和行为健康专业人员;(3)高级实践提供者(APPs),即执业护士和医师助理。
所有利益相关者(即患者、提供者和工作人员)对护理协调员和扩展护理专家都给予了积极评价;这些角色定义明确且迅速得以实施。护理协调员有效地管理了就诊期间的护理,并与患者建立了牢固的关系。专家同地办公方便了患者就医,并为糖尿病服务和心理保健提供了有力支持。我们还观察到了意想不到的价值:护理协调员在记录时将与就诊相关的病历信息传达给提供者;扩展护理专家支持非正式的继续医学教育。相比之下,我们观察到各利益相关者对APP角色的定义和期望不明确;因此,该角色的采用情况和可接受性各不相同。
实践重新设计可以在整个团队中重新分配责任和患者联系,但应强调明确的角色。在实施早期从多利益相关者的角度进行人种志研究,可以快速提供可操作的见解,了解哪些角色可能需要完善或重新定义,以支持患者最终的身心健康结局。