Dohar Joseph E, Shaffer Amber D, White Katherine E
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;125:147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.06.031. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
Despite the fact that vocal nodules are the most common cause of chronic dysphonia in children, uncertainty and lack of consensus complicates practically every diagnostic and management decision. Selecting an optimal staging system is fundamental to understanding a disease process, mandatory for uniform reporting, and crucial to predicting natural history and treatment outcomes. The ideal prognostic model for vocal nodules is under intense debate. The purpose of this study was to analyze the predictive power of vocal nodule grade to severity of voice metrics in children.
Seventy-nine patients diagnosed with vocal cord nodules between 2006 and 2012 were drawn from UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Voice, Resonance and Swallowing Center Research Registry. Subject age at time of diagnosis, nodule grade, relevant co-morbidities, scores on The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), parent-reported Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI), the phonotraumatic behaviors profile, habitual speaking pitch fundamental frequencies, pitch range, volume intensity, and s/z ratio were recorded and compiled into a de-identified database for analysis.
Based on the Kruskal-Wallis H Test, there was no statistically significant correlation between nodule grade and total pitch range (p = .21), s/z ratio (p = .50), volume intensity (p = .33), overall CAPE-V Scores (p = .15), or pVHI Scores (p = .29). Chi-squared tests also revealed no significant associations between nodule grade and abnormality in habitual speaking pitch (p = .14 for fundamental frequency while sustaining a vowel sound, p = .37 for fundamental frequency while speaking structured tasks i.e. counting, or p = .76 while speaking in conversation).
The current "gold-standard" for grading vocal nodule size suggests that the nodules themselves are not driving the standard dysphonic metrics that are most commonly collected and monitored in such children. This outcome is consistent with other studies reporting similar findings and was expected based on the inconsistencies in the reported literature to date. By extension, the conventional wisdom of avoiding surgical treatment of vocal nodules in children seems prudent as there is little evidence to suggest that the nodules themselves are "driving" the severity of the dysphonia. Ultimately identifying the true "drivers" of dysphonia in children will suggest alternative therapies that are more specific and directed to the pathophysiology. Most pediatric voice care professionals will welcome such discoveries as those in the front line of patient care are often rendered helpless and frustrated.
尽管声带小结是儿童慢性发声障碍最常见的病因,但实际上每个诊断和管理决策都因不确定性和缺乏共识而变得复杂。选择一个最佳的分期系统对于理解疾病进程至关重要,是统一报告所必需的,并且对于预测自然病程和治疗结果至关重要。关于声带小结的理想预后模型仍在激烈争论中。本研究的目的是分析声带小结分级对儿童嗓音指标严重程度的预测能力。
从匹兹堡大学医学中心儿童医院嗓音、共鸣与吞咽中心研究登记处选取了1996年至2012年间诊断为声带小结的79例患者。记录诊断时的受试者年龄、小结分级、相关合并症、嗓音共识听觉-感知评估(CAPE-V)得分、家长报告的儿童嗓音障碍指数(pVHI)、发声创伤行为概况、习惯性说话基频、音高范围、音量强度和s/z比,并将其汇编到一个去识别数据库中进行分析。
基于Kruskal-Wallis H检验,小结分级与总音高范围(p = 0.21)、s/z比(p = 0.50)、音量强度(p = 0.33)、CAPE-V总分(p = 0.15)或pVHI得分(p = 0.29)之间无统计学显著相关性。卡方检验还显示,小结分级与习惯性说话音高异常之间无显著关联(发元音时基频p = 0.14,进行结构化任务如计数时基频p = 0.37,对话时基频p = 0.76)。
目前声带小结大小分级的“金标准”表明,小结本身并非此类儿童最常收集和监测的标准发声障碍指标的驱动因素。这一结果与其他报告类似发现的研究一致,并且基于迄今为止文献报道的不一致性是可以预期的。由此推断,避免对儿童声带小结进行手术治疗的传统观念似乎是谨慎的,因为几乎没有证据表明小结本身“驱动”了发声障碍的严重程度。最终确定儿童发声障碍的真正“驱动因素”将提示更具针对性且针对病理生理学的替代疗法。大多数儿童嗓音护理专业人员会欢迎这样的发现,因为处于患者护理一线的人员常常感到无助和沮丧。