• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估心力衰竭三种虚弱表型版本的会聚和判别有效性:FRAME-HF 研究结果。

Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of three versions of the frailty phenotype in heart failure: results from the FRAME-HF study.

机构信息

Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Jan;19(1):55-63. doi: 10.1177/1474515119865150. Epub 2019 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1177/1474515119865150
PMID:31328532
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frailty is an important predictive measure of mortality and rehospitalisation in people with heart failure. To date, there are no frailty instruments validated for use in people with heart failure.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of three versions of the frailty phenotype in those with heart failure.

METHODS

A single site, prospective cohort study was undertaken among individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of heart failure. Frailty was assessed concurrently using three versions of the frailty phenotype: the original frailty phenotype and two modified versions; the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe frailty instrument (SHARE-FI) and the St Vincent's frailty instrument. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed by reporting the correlations between each version and related heart failure subconstructs, and by evaluating the ability of each version to discriminate between normal and abnormal scores of other physical and psychosocial scales specific to heart failure-related subconstructs.

RESULTS

The New York Heart Association classes were moderately correlated with the St Vincent's frailty instrument (=0.47, ⩽0.001), SHARE-FI (=0.42, ⩽0.001) and the frailty phenotype (=0.42, ⩽0.001). The SHARE-FI and the St Vincent's frailty instrument were both able to discriminate consistently between normal and abnormal scores in three out of five of the physical and psychosocial subconstructs that were assessed. The SHARE-FI was also able to discriminate between inpatients and outpatients who were classified as frail.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the SHARE-FI and the St Vincent's frailty instrument displayed good convergent and discriminant validity.

摘要

背景

衰弱是预测心力衰竭患者死亡率和再住院率的重要指标。迄今为止,尚无针对心力衰竭患者的衰弱量表得到验证。

目的

本研究旨在评估三种衰弱表型版本在心力衰竭患者中的收敛和判别效度。

方法

采用单站点前瞻性队列研究,纳入确诊为心力衰竭的患者。同时使用三种衰弱表型版本评估衰弱:原始衰弱表型和两种改良版本;欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE-FI)衰弱量表和圣文森特衰弱量表。通过报告每个版本与相关心力衰竭亚结构之间的相关性,以及评估每个版本区分正常和异常的心力衰竭相关亚结构的特定物理和心理社会量表的能力,评估收敛和判别效度。

结果

纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级与圣文森特衰弱量表(=0.47,P<0.001)、SHARE-FI(=0.42,P<0.001)和衰弱表型(=0.42,P<0.001)中度相关。SHARE-FI 和圣文森特衰弱量表都能够在五个物理和心理社会亚结构中的三个亚结构中,一致地区分正常和异常评分。SHARE-FI 还能够区分被归类为衰弱的住院患者和门诊患者。

结论

SHARE-FI 和圣文森特衰弱量表均具有良好的收敛和判别效度。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of three versions of the frailty phenotype in heart failure: results from the FRAME-HF study.评估心力衰竭三种虚弱表型版本的会聚和判别有效性:FRAME-HF 研究结果。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Jan;19(1):55-63. doi: 10.1177/1474515119865150. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
2
Comparison of six frailty instruments in adults with heart failure: a prospective cohort pilot study.比较 6 种衰弱工具在心力衰竭成人中的应用:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023 May 25;22(4):345-354. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvac100.
3
Operationalization of frailty using eight commonly used scales and comparison of their ability to predict all-cause mortality.使用八种常用量表对虚弱进行操作化,并比较它们预测全因死亡率的能力。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Sep;61(9):1537-51. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12420. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
4
A Frailty Instrument for primary care for those aged 75 years or more: findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, a longitudinal population-based cohort study (SHARE-FI75+).一种针对75岁及以上老年人初级保健的衰弱评估工具:基于纵向人群队列研究“欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查”(SHARE-FI75+)的结果
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 23;4(12):e006645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006645.
5
Screening for frailty in older emergency department patients: the utility of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe Frailty Instrument.老年急诊科患者衰弱筛查:欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查衰弱量表的效用。
QJM. 2018 Mar 1;111(3):151-154. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcx242.
6
Identifying common characteristics of frailty across seven scales.确定七个量表中虚弱的共同特征。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 May;62(5):901-6. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12773. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
7
Convergent validity of the electronic frailty index.电子衰弱指数的聚合效度。
Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):152-156. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy162.
8
[The Frailty Instrument for primary care of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE-FI): results of the Spanish sample].[欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查(SHARE)初级保健衰弱量表(SHARE-FI):西班牙样本结果]
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2011 Sep-Oct;46(5):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
9
A frailty instrument for primary care: findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).用于初级保健的衰弱量表:来自欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的研究结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2010 Aug 24;10:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-10-57.
10
Frailty prevalence according to the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe-Frailty Instrument (SHARE-FI) definition, and its variables associated, in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: findings from a cross-sectional study.根据欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查-脆弱性工具(SHARE-FI)定义,对有症状性膝骨关节炎患者的脆弱性流行情况及其相关变量进行调查:一项横断面研究的结果。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jun;33(6):1519-1527. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01667-0. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A Narrative Review of the Utilisation of the SHARE Frailty Instruments (SHARE-FI and SHARE-FI75+) in the Literature.关于文献中SHARE衰弱量表(SHARE-FI和SHARE-FI75+)应用情况的叙述性综述
J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2023 Dec 1;8(4):221-229. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-08-221. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Measuring frailty in younger populations: a rapid review of evidence.测量年轻人群的脆弱性:证据快速综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e047051. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047051.
3
Gender differences in the prevalence of frailty in heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
性别差异与心力衰竭衰弱患病率的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 15;333:133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.062. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
4
Reversibility of Frailty after Lung Transplantation.肺移植后衰弱的可逆性
J Transplant. 2020 Aug 7;2020:3239495. doi: 10.1155/2020/3239495. eCollection 2020.