Departments of Psychology and Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina (Drs Burch and Sears); Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin, Klinische Abteilung für Kardiologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria (Dr Scherr and Ms Odeneg); Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH, Benekestrasse Nauheim, Germany (Dr Rieth); Cardiovascular Associates, Virginia Beach, Virginia (Dr Griffin); and ZOLL Medical, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Bianco).
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020 Mar;40(2):E14-E17. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000441.
The 6-min walk test (6MWT) is broadly used to evaluate the functional ability of patients with heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD)-guided 6MWT performed at home by patients with HF versus in-clinic testing.
Patients (n = 197) with HF and a low ejection fraction prescribed a WCD were randomized to 2 groups. Group 1 completed an in-clinic clinician-guided 6MWT while wearing the WCD; results were recorded by the clinician. Group 2 completed a WCD-guided 6MWT, also performed in the clinic; results were recorded by the WCD accelerometer. Both groups performed weekly unsupervised WCD-guided 6MWTs at home, with results recorded by the WCD.
The initial in-clinic 6MWT showed no significant group difference in distance walked (group 1 = 306 m; group 2 = 297 m). For patients in group 2 who completed at least one 6MWT at home, there was a 15-step decrease between the in-clinic WCD-guided 6MWT and the first at-home 6MWT, 558 and 543 median steps (P = .001), respectively. Among patients with at least 8 weekly home WCD-guided 6MWTs (n = 70), there was no significant difference in the number of steps walked during the 6MWT from week to week.
Results of the in-clinic 6MWT are similar between clinician-guided and WCD-guided patients across objective distances. Distances walked with a WCD-guided walk test were consistent whether conducted in the clinic or at home and were reliable over time.
6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)广泛用于评估心力衰竭(HF)患者的功能能力。本研究旨在评估 HF 患者在家中佩戴可穿戴除颤器(WCD)进行与在诊所进行的 WCD 指导的 6MWT 的准确性和可靠性。
患有 HF 和低射血分数并被处方 WCD 的患者(n=197)被随机分为 2 组。组 1 在佩戴 WCD 的情况下完成了临床医生指导的 6MWT;结果由临床医生记录。组 2 在诊所中完成了 WCD 指导的 6MWT;结果由 WCD 加速度计记录。两组均在诊所中每周进行一次无人监督的 WCD 指导的 6MWT,结果由 WCD 记录。
初始的门诊 6MWT 显示两组之间步行距离无显著差异(组 1=306m;组 2=297m)。对于在组 2 中至少完成一次家庭 6MWT 的患者,门诊 WCD 指导的 6MWT 与第一次家庭 6MWT 之间的步行距离减少了 15 步,中位数分别为 543 步和 558 步(P=0.001)。在至少进行了 8 次每周家庭 WCD 指导的 6MWT 的患者中(n=70),6MWT 期间每周步行的步数没有显著差异。
在客观距离上,临床医生指导和 WCD 指导的患者的门诊 6MWT 结果相似。WCD 指导的步行测试的步行距离在诊所或家中进行时是一致的,并且随着时间的推移是可靠的。