Department of Health, Kinesiology and Recreation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Apr;43(7):953-959. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1643421. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
The aim of this study was to examine: (1) motivations of patients with chronic low back pain to attend physical therapy; (2) relationships between competence perceptions, motivational regulations, and pain/disability; and (3) whether patient motivations to attend physical therapy mediate the relationship between competence perceptions and pain/disability.
A sample of 64 participants completed baseline assessment (1-week prior to initiation of physical therapy) and 6-week follow-up assessment. Differences between motivation variables at baseline were examined using one-way within-person ANOVA. Relationships between competence perceptions, motivation subscales, and pain/disability were calculated using bivariate correlations and multiple mediation analyses.
Participants reported significantly higher levels of autonomous versus controlled motivation (mean difference = 3.5, < 0.001, = 2.3) and amotivation (mean difference = 3.6, < 0.001, = 2.4). Competence was positively associated with autonomous motivation ( = 0.45, ≤ 0.05) and negatively associated with controlled motivation ( = -0.26, ≤ 0.05), amotivation ( = -0.57, ≤ 0.05), pain ( = -0.35, ≤ 0.05), and disability ( = -0.34, ≤ 0.05). Amotivation significantly mediated the competence-pain relationship (Amotivation IE = -0.19, 95% CI (-0.44, -0.06), < 0.05) and the competence-disability relationship (Amotivation IE = -0.07, 95% CI (-0.17, -0.01), < 0.05).
Findings highlight the role of competence perceptions in mitigating amotivation for physical therapy and the deleterious implications of amotivation for patient-centered outcomes.Implications for rehabilitationWhile it is normal for patients to experience periods where they lack motivation for rehabilitation exercises, practitioners can encourage patients to assume responsibility for their recovery by informing them that amotivated states may increase the likelihood of increased pain perceptions and disability.Health-care practitioners should seek to foster competence perceptions in patients about to undergo physical therapy.Competence building strategies such as patient education, goal setting, and role modeling may be valuable in facilitating autonomous motivation and reducing amotivation for physical therapy.
本研究旨在检验:(1)慢性下背痛患者参加物理治疗的动机;(2)能力感知、动机调节与疼痛/残疾之间的关系;以及(3)患者参加物理治疗的动机是否在能力感知与疼痛/残疾之间起中介作用。
64 名参与者完成了基线评估(在开始物理治疗前一周)和 6 周随访评估。使用单因素 within-person ANOVA 检验基线时动机变量的差异。使用双变量相关和多重中介分析计算能力感知、动机分量表和疼痛/残疾之间的关系。
参与者报告的自主动机明显高于控制动机(平均差异=3.5,<0.001,=2.3)和动机缺乏(平均差异=3.6,<0.001,=2.4)。能力与自主动机呈正相关(=0.45,≤0.05),与控制动机呈负相关(=-0.26,≤0.05),与动机缺乏呈负相关(=-0.57,≤0.05),与疼痛呈负相关(=-0.35,≤0.05),与残疾呈负相关(=-0.34,≤0.05)。动机缺乏显著中介了能力与疼痛之间的关系(动机缺乏的间接效应=0.19,95%置信区间(-0.44,-0.06),<0.05)和能力与残疾之间的关系(动机缺乏的间接效应=0.07,95%置信区间(-0.17,-0.01),<0.05)。
研究结果强调了能力感知在减轻物理治疗动机缺乏方面的作用,以及动机缺乏对以患者为中心的结果的有害影响。
虽然患者在康复锻炼期间经历缺乏动机的阶段是正常的,但从业者可以通过告知患者,缺乏动机的状态可能会增加疼痛感知和残疾的可能性,从而鼓励患者对自己的康复负责。
即将接受物理治疗的患者应努力培养能力感知。患者教育、设定目标和角色扮演等能力建设策略可能对促进自主动机和减少对物理治疗的动机缺乏很有价值。