Induction of ovulation with pulsatile GnRH: comparison between subcutaneous and intravenous administration in the same patients.

In this study we compared the results obtained during GnRH pulsatile therapy for ovulation induction in the same patients receiving successively GnRH by subcutaneous (10 mcg/90') and intravenous route (2.5 or 5 mcg/90'). Our data suggest that intravenous administration is the most effective procedure for restoring fertility, either in terms of hormonal levels (oestradiol and gonadotropin peaks) or ovulation rate (100% of ovulatory cycles on GnRH treatment versus 25% on subcutaneous administration). With regard to intravenous GnRH therapy, the dose of 2.5 mcg/90' may be more advisable and safe from ovarian overstimulation.