• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经化与非神经化 DIEP 皮瓣乳房再造术后乳房感觉的恢复。

Sensory Recovery of the Breast following Innervated and Noninnervated DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

机构信息

From the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and the Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center; the Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Maastricht University; and the Center for Breast Restoration, Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Aug;144(2):178e-188e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005802.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000005802
PMID:31348332
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The sensory recovery of the breast remains an undervalued aspect of autologous breast reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nerve coaptation on the sensory recovery of the breast following DIEP flap breast reconstruction and to assess the associations of length of follow-up and timing of the reconstruction.

METHODS

A prospective comparative study was conducted of all patients who underwent either innervated or noninnervated DIEP flap breast reconstruction and returned for follow-up between September of 2015 and July of 2017. Nerve coaptation was performed to the anterior cutaneous branch of the third intercostal nerve. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments were used for sensory testing of the native skin and flap skin.

RESULTS

A total of 48 innervated DIEP flaps in 36 patients and 61 noninnervated DIEP flaps in 45 patients were tested at different follow-up time points. Nerve coaptation was significantly associated with lower monofilament values in all areas of the reconstructed breast (adjusted difference, -1.2; p < 0.001), which indicated that sensory recovery of the breast was significantly better in innervated compared with noninnervated DIEP flaps. For every month of follow-up, the mean monofilament value decreased by 0.083 in innervated flaps (p < 0.001) and 0.012 in noninnervated flaps (p < 0.001). Nerve coaptation significantly improved sensation in both immediate and delayed reconstructions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that nerve coaptation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction is associated with a significantly better sensory recovery in all areas of the reconstructed breast compared with noninnervated flaps. The length of follow-up was significantly associated with the sensory recovery.

摘要

背景

乳房的感觉恢复仍然是自体乳房重建中被低估的一个方面。本研究旨在评估神经吻合对 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建后乳房感觉恢复的影响,并评估随访时间和重建时间的相关性。

方法

对 2015 年 9 月至 2017 年 7 月间接受神经吻合或非神经吻合 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建并进行随访的所有患者进行前瞻性比较研究。神经吻合采用第三肋间前皮支。使用 Semmes-Weinstein 单丝进行皮瓣皮肤和原生皮肤的感觉测试。

结果

共有 36 名患者的 48 个神经吻合的 DIEP 皮瓣和 45 名患者的 61 个非神经吻合的 DIEP 皮瓣在不同的随访时间点进行了测试。神经吻合与重建乳房各部位的单丝值较低显著相关(调整差异,-1.2;p<0.001),表明神经吻合的 DIEP 皮瓣乳房感觉恢复明显优于非神经吻合的 DIEP 皮瓣。在每个月的随访中,神经吻合的皮瓣平均单丝值下降 0.083(p<0.001),而非神经吻合的皮瓣下降 0.012(p<0.001)。神经吻合在即刻和延迟重建中均显著改善了感觉。

结论

本研究表明,DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建中的神经吻合与非神经吻合皮瓣相比,可显著改善重建乳房各部位的感觉恢复。随访时间与感觉恢复显著相关。

相似文献

1
Sensory Recovery of the Breast following Innervated and Noninnervated DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.神经化与非神经化 DIEP 皮瓣乳房再造术后乳房感觉的恢复。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Aug;144(2):178e-188e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005802.
2
Nerve Coaptation Improves the Sensory Recovery of the Breast in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.神经吻合可改善 DIEP 皮瓣乳房再造术后乳房的感觉恢复。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Aug 1;148(2):273-284. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008160.
3
Sensory Recovery of the Breast following Innervated and Noninnervated Lateral Thigh Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.神经化与非神经化股外侧穿支皮瓣乳房再造术后乳房感觉的恢复。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;147(2):281-292. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007547.
4
Breast sensibility in bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with unilateral sensory nerve coaptation.单侧感觉神经吻合的双侧自体乳房重建中的乳房感觉功能
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun;181(3):599-610. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05645-y. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
5
Sensory recovery in the sensate free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap.带感觉的游离腹直肌肌皮瓣的感觉恢复
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Apr 15;115(5):1280-8. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000156988.78391.d6.
6
The efficacy of sensory nerve coaptation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction - Preliminary results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.感觉神经吻合在 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建中的疗效 - 一项双盲随机对照试验的初步结果。
Breast. 2024 Apr;74:103691. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103691. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
7
Clinical Relevance of Sensory Nerve Coaptation in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction Evaluated Using the BREAST-Q.神经感觉吻合在 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建中的临床相关性评估——使用 BREAST-Q。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Nov 1;150(5):959e-969e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009617. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
8
Prospective computerized analyses of sensibility in breast reconstruction with non-reinnervated DIEP flap.前瞻性分析非神经化 DIEP 皮瓣乳房再造的敏感性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 May;127(5):1790-1795. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf1c6.
9
Sensibility following innervated free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction.带蒂游离腹直肌肌皮瓣乳房重建术后的感觉功能
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jun;117(7):2119-27; discussion 2128-30. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000218268.59024.cc.
10
Sensory nerve repair in perforator flaps for autologous breast reconstruction: sensational or senseless?用于自体乳房重建的穿支皮瓣感觉神经修复:有意义还是无意义?
Br J Plast Surg. 1999 Jan;52(1):37-44. doi: 10.1054/bjps.1998.3011.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Recipient Nerve Selection for Breast Neurotization with Abdominal Flaps: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Anterior and Lateral Intercostal Approaches.腹部皮瓣乳房神经化的最佳受区神经选择:肋间前支和外侧支入路的综合Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 3;14(15):5461. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155461.
2
Trastuzumab holds potential to accelerate spontaneous sensory reinnervation after free flap breast reconstruction: a proof of concept.曲妥珠单抗有望加速游离皮瓣乳房重建术后的自发性感觉神经再支配:概念验证。
Innov Surg Sci. 2024 Jul 24;10(2):81-89. doi: 10.1515/iss-2023-0070. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Meta-analysis of Objective Sensory Outcomes From 764 Breasts Shows Superior Sensation of Autologous Reconstruction With Neurotization.
对764例乳房的客观感觉结果进行的荟萃分析表明,神经化自体乳房重建的感觉更佳。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 May 6;13(5):e6751. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006751. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Nerve coaptation in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction.腹壁下动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣乳房重建中的神经吻合
Gland Surg. 2025 Feb 28;14(2):238-241. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-455. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
5
The Current State of the Art in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Review and Modern/Future Approaches.自体乳房重建的当前技术水平:综述与现代/未来方法
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 25;14(5):1543. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051543.
6
Advances in Microsurgical Treatment Options to Optimize Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.优化自体游离皮瓣乳房重建的显微外科治疗方案进展。
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 24;13(19):5672. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195672.
7
Innervated breast reconstruction: a narrative review of neurotization techniques and outcomes.神经支配乳房重建:神经化技术与结果的叙述性综述
Ann Transl Med. 2024 Aug 1;12(4):76. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-504. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
8
The influence of a previous implant-based breast reconstruction on postoperative sensation of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap.既往基于植入物的乳房重建对腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣术后感觉的影响。
Breast Cancer. 2024 May;31(3):456-466. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01558-6. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
9
Efficacy and safety of intercostal nerve anastomosis in immediate subpectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction after nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy: a randomized, controlled, open-label clinical study.保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术后即刻胸大肌下假体乳房重建中肋间神经吻合术的疗效与安全性:一项随机、对照、开放标签的临床研究
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 26;14:1261936. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1261936. eCollection 2024.
10
Preservation versus dissection of the intercostobrachial nerve for breast cancer surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺癌手术中肋间臂神经的保留与解剖:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Dec 13;86(2):1003-1011. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001622. eCollection 2024 Feb.