Mohamed Hadeer H, Ibrahim Sokkar Mai, Afifi Ahmed M, Saad Anas M, Albarouki Sali, Al-Husseini Muneer J
Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;40(2):233-239. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1621808. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
We aimed at finding the impact of prior malignancies on the survival of patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma using SEER database (from 1973 to 2014). We identified 127,988 patients who were diagnosed with endometrial adenocarcinoma (6485 had a prior malignancy), and we compared the overall and cancer-specific survival based on the presence or absence of a prior malignancy and the latency period between the two diagnoses using Kaplan-Meier test and Cox models. Adjusted cox models showed that a history of a prior malignancy neither affected the overall survival nor the cancer-specific survival of stage IV cases in all latency groups except the one diagnosed within 1 year of the first cancer. Therefore, there is no rational explanation for excluding stage IV endometrial adenocarcinoma patients with a prior malignancy from clinical trials except for the group that was diagnosed with endometrial adenocarcinoma within 1 year from the first cancer.Impact statement Not enough evidence is found on the impact of prior malignancies on the survival of patients with subsequent endometrial adenocarcinoma. History of a prior malignancy neither affects the overall survival of stage IV endometrial adenocarcinoma nor the cancer-specific survival. Only patients who had their second malignancy diagnosed within one year of the first malignancy should be excluded from clinical trials, while patients diagnosed within one to five years of the first cancer should be encouraged to enrol in clinical trials as they have an enhanced survival than patients without a history of malignancy. We recommend that future researchers should consider including the aforementioned group of patients in their trials to achieve more accurate results and in order not to strip the patients of potential therapeutic benefits of enrolling in clinical trials.
我们旨在利用监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据库(1973年至2014年),探究既往恶性肿瘤对子宫内膜腺癌患者生存情况的影响。我们确定了127988例被诊断为子宫内膜腺癌的患者(其中6485例有既往恶性肿瘤史),并使用Kaplan-Meier检验和Cox模型,根据是否有既往恶性肿瘤史以及两次诊断之间的潜伏期,比较了总生存率和癌症特异性生存率。调整后的Cox模型显示,除了在首次患癌后1年内被诊断出的病例外,既往恶性肿瘤史在所有潜伏期组中均不影响IV期病例的总生存率和癌症特异性生存率。因此,除了在首次患癌后1年内被诊断为子宫内膜腺癌的患者组外,没有合理的理由将有既往恶性肿瘤史的IV期子宫内膜腺癌患者排除在临床试验之外。影响声明未找到足够证据证明既往恶性肿瘤对后续子宫内膜腺癌患者生存情况的影响。既往恶性肿瘤史既不影响IV期子宫内膜腺癌的总生存率,也不影响癌症特异性生存率。只有在首次患癌后1年内被诊断出第二次恶性肿瘤的患者应被排除在临床试验之外,而在首次患癌后1至5年内被诊断出的患者应被鼓励参加临床试验,因为他们的生存率高于无恶性肿瘤史的患者。我们建议未来的研究人员在试验中应考虑纳入上述患者组,以获得更准确的结果,并且为了不剥夺患者参加临床试验可能带来的治疗益处。