Department of Medical Anatomical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, 309 E. Second St. Pomona, California, 91766-1854, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2019 Aug;133:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
The visual-predation hypothesis proposes that certain derived features shared by crown primates reflect an insectivorous ancestry. Critics of this idea have argued that because insectivory is uncommon among extant primates it is unlikely to have been a major influence on early primate evolution. According to this perspective, the low frequency of insectivory indicates that it is an apomorphic deviation from the mostly conserved primate ecological pattern of herbivory. The present study tests two alternative hypotheses that are compatible with an insectivorous ancestor: (1) that trophic evolution was biased, such that herbivory evolved repeatedly with few shifts back to insectivory, and (2) that insectivorous lineages have diversified at a lower rate than herbivorous lineages owing to differential trophic effects on speciation and extinction probabilities. Model-based analysis conducted using trait data for 307 extant primate species indicates that rates of transition into and out of insectivory are similar, rejecting the hypothesis of biased trophic evolution. On the other hand, the hypothesis of asymmetric diversification is supported, with insectivorous lineages having a lower rate of diversification than herbivorous lineages. This correlation is mediated by activity pattern: insectivory occurs mostly in nocturnal lineages, which have a lower diversification rate than diurnal lineages. The frequency of insectivory also appears to have been shaped by repeated transitions into ecological contexts in which insectivory is absent (large body size) or rare (diurnality). These findings suggest that the current distribution of trophic strategies among extant primates is the result of macroevolutionary processes that have favored the proliferation and persistence of herbivory relative to insectivory. This conclusion implies that the low frequency of insectivory is not necessarily evidence against the visual-predation hypothesis.
视觉捕食假说提出,冠层灵长类动物共有的某些衍生特征反映了食虫的祖先。该观点的批评者认为,由于食虫在现存灵长类动物中并不常见,因此它不太可能对早期灵长类动物的进化产生重大影响。根据这一观点,食虫的低频率表明它是一种从主要的草食性灵长类生态模式中特化出来的偏离。本研究检验了与食虫祖先相容的两个替代假设:(1)营养进化存在偏向,即草食性多次进化,很少有食虫性的转变;(2)由于食虫谱系对物种形成和灭绝概率的营养效应不同,食虫谱系的多样化速度比草食性谱系慢。使用 307 种现存灵长类物种的特征数据进行的基于模型的分析表明,食虫性的转变进入和退出的速度相似,从而否定了营养进化偏向的假设。另一方面,不对称多样化的假设得到了支持,食虫性谱系的多样化速度比草食性谱系慢。这种相关性受到活动模式的调节:食虫性主要发生在夜间活动的谱系中,它们的多样化速度比日间活动的谱系慢。食虫性的频率似乎也受到反复进入没有食虫性(大体型)或罕见食虫性(昼行性)的生态环境的影响。这些发现表明,现存灵长类动物中营养策略的当前分布是有利于草食性相对于食虫性的增殖和持续的宏观进化过程的结果。这一结论意味着食虫性的低频率不一定是反对视觉捕食假说的证据。