Suppr超能文献

哪些人从紧急医疗服务中获得纳洛酮?呼叫特征及近期趋势。

Who receives naloxone from emergency medical services? Characteristics of calls and recent trends.

作者信息

Geiger Caroline, Smart Rosanna, Stein Bradley D

机构信息

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.

出版信息

Subst Abus. 2020;41(3):400-407. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1640832. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

Abstract

With the rapid rise in opioid overdose-related deaths, state policy makers have expanded policies to increase the use of naloxone by emergency medical services (EMS). However, little is known about changes in EMS naloxone administration in the context of continued worsening of the opioid crisis and efforts to increase use of naloxone. This study examines trends in patient demographics and EMS response characteristics over time and by county urbanicity. We used data from the 2013-2016 National EMS Information System to examine trends in patient demographics and EMS response characteristics for 911-initiated incidents that resulted in EMS naloxone administration. We also assessed temporal, regional, and urban-rural variation in per capita rates of EMS naloxone administrations compared with per capita rates of opioid-related overdose deaths. From 2013 to 2016, naloxone administrations increasingly involved young adults and occurred in public settings. Particularly in urban counties, there were modest but significant increases in the percentage of individuals who refused subsequent treatment, were treated and released, and received multiple administrations of naloxone before and after arrival of EMS personnel. Over the 4-year period, EMS naloxone administrations per capita increased at a faster rate than opioid-related overdose deaths across urban, suburban, and rural counties. Although national rates of naloxone administration were consistently higher in suburban counties, these trends varied across U.S. Census Regions, with the highest rates of suburban administration occurring in the South. Naloxone administration rates increased more quickly than opioid deaths across all levels of county urbanicity, but increases in the percentage of individuals requiring multiple doses and refusing subsequent care require further attention.

摘要

随着阿片类药物过量相关死亡人数的迅速上升,州政策制定者已扩大政策,以增加紧急医疗服务(EMS)对纳洛酮的使用。然而,在阿片类药物危机持续恶化以及增加纳洛酮使用的努力背景下,关于EMS纳洛酮给药的变化情况却知之甚少。本研究考察了患者人口统计学特征和EMS反应特征随时间以及按县城市化程度的变化趋势。我们使用了2013 - 2016年国家EMS信息系统的数据,来研究导致EMS使用纳洛酮的911紧急事件中患者人口统计学特征和EMS反应特征的变化趋势。我们还评估了EMS纳洛酮给药人均率与阿片类药物相关过量死亡人均率的时间、区域和城乡差异。从2013年到2016年,纳洛酮给药越来越多地涉及年轻人,且发生在公共场所。特别是在城市县,拒绝后续治疗、接受治疗并出院以及在EMS人员到达之前和之后接受多次纳洛酮给药的个体百分比有适度但显著的增加。在这4年期间,城市、郊区和农村县的EMS纳洛酮人均给药量的增长速度快于阿片类药物相关过量死亡人数的增长速度。尽管郊区县的全国纳洛酮给药率一直较高,但这些趋势在美国人口普查区域之间存在差异,郊区给药率最高的是南部地区。在所有县城市化水平中,纳洛酮给药率的增长速度都比阿片类药物死亡人数的增长速度快,但需要多次给药和拒绝后续护理的个体百分比增加的情况需要进一步关注。

相似文献

1
Who receives naloxone from emergency medical services? Characteristics of calls and recent trends.
Subst Abus. 2020;41(3):400-407. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1640832. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
No deaths associated with patient refusal of transport after naloxone-reversed opioid overdose.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):320-4. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.569854.
3
Measuring a Crisis: Questioning the Use of Naloxone Administrations as a Marker for Opioid Overdoses in a Large U.S. EMS System.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 May-Jun;22(3):281-289. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1387628. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
4
Layperson-Administered Naloxone Trends Reported in Emergency Medical Service Activations, 2020-2022.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2439427. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.39427.
6
EMS runs for suspected opioid overdose: implications for surveillance and prevention.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):317-29. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.792888.
7
Naloxone Administration Frequency During Emergency Medical Service Events - United States, 2012-2016.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Aug 10;67(31):850-853. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6731a2.
9
Adverse Effects After Prehospital Administration of Naloxone by Bystanders: A Preliminary Study.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2024 Apr;39(2):212-217. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X24000128. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
10
Use of Naloxone by Emergency Medical Services during Opioid Drug Overdose Resuscitation Efforts.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(2):220-5. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1076096. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of non-transport by emergency medical services after a nonfatal opioid overdose: a national analysis.
Health Aff Sch. 2025 May 20;3(5):qxaf101. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf101. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Patient perceptions of higher-dose naloxone nasal spray for opioid overdose.
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Aug;106:103751. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103751. Epub 2022 May 26.
4
Real-world study of multiple naloxone administration for opioid overdose reversal among bystanders.
Harm Reduct J. 2022 May 20;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00627-3.
5
Modeling of overdose and naloxone distribution in the setting of fentanyl compared to heroin.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Jul 1;236:109478. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109478. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
7
Increasingly powerful opioid antagonists are not necessary.
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Jan;99:103457. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103457. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
8
Naloxone therapy for prescription and illicit opioid poisoning cases aged 50 + in the national poison data system, 2015-2020.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2022 Apr;60(4):499-506. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2021.1981362. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
9
Predictors of having naloxone in urban and rural Oregon findings from NHBS and the OR-HOPE study.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Oct 1;227:108912. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108912. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
10

本文引用的文献

2
Effect of Age on Opioid Prescribing, Overdose, and Mortality in Massachusetts, 2011 to 2015.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jan;67(1):128-132. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15659. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
3
EMS naloxone administration as non-fatal opioid overdose surveillance: 6-year outcomes in Marion County, Indiana.
Addiction. 2018 Dec;113(12):2271-2279. doi: 10.1111/add.14426. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
4
Opportunities to Prevent Overdose Deaths Involving Prescription and Illicit Opioids, 11 States, July 2016-June 2017.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Aug 31;67(34):945-951. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6734a2.
5
Naloxone Administration Frequency During Emergency Medical Service Events - United States, 2012-2016.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Aug 10;67(31):850-853. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6731a2.
6
Risks of fatal opioid overdose during the first year following nonfatal overdose.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Sep 1;190:112-119. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
8
Medication for Opioid Use Disorder After Nonfatal Opioid Overdose and Association With Mortality: A Cohort Study.
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Aug 7;169(3):137-145. doi: 10.7326/M17-3107. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
9
Naloxone laws facilitate the establishment of overdose education and naloxone distribution programs in the United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jul 1;188:370-376. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 15.
10
Opioid-related mortality in rural America: Geographic heterogeneity and intervention strategies.
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jul;57:119-129. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 May 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验