From the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anesth Analg. 2021 Feb 1;132(2):367-373. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004344.
In patients presenting for pyloromyotomy, most practitioners prioritize rapid securement of the airway due to concern for aspiration. However, there is a lack of consensus and limited evidence on the choice between rapid sequence induction (RSI) and modified RSI (mRSI).
The medical records of all patients presenting for pyloromyotomy from May 2012 to December 2018 were reviewed. The risk of hypoxemia (peripheral oxygen saturation [Spo2], <90%) during induction was compared between RSI and mRSI cohorts for all patients identified as well as in the neonate subgroup by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Complications (aspiration, intensive care unit admission, bradycardia, postoperative stridor, and hypotension) and initial intubation success for both cohorts were also compared.
A total of 296 patients were identified: 181 in the RSI and 115 in the mRSI cohorts. RSI was associated with significantly higher rates of hypoxemia than mRSI (RSI, 30% [23%-37%]; mRSI, 17% [10%-24%]; P = .016). In multivariable logistic regression analysis of all patients, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of hypoxemia for RSI versus mRSI was 2.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-5.3; P = .003) and the OR of hypoxemia for multiple versus a single intubation attempt was 11.4 (95% CI, 5.8-22.5; P < .001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis of neonatal subgroup, the OR of hypoxemia for RSI versus mRSI was 6.5 (95% CI, 2.0-22.2; P < .001) and the OR of hypoxemia for multiple intubation versus single intubation attempts was 18.1 (95% CI, 4.7-40; P < .001). There were no induction-related complications in either the RSI and mRSI cohorts, and the initial intubation success rate was identical for both cohorts (78%).
In infants presenting for pyloromyotomy, anesthetic induction with mRSI compared with RSI was associated with significantly less hypoxemia without an observed increase in aspiration events. In addition, the need for multiple intubation attempts was a strong predictor of hypoxemia. The increased risk of hypoxemia associated with RSI and multiple intubation attempts was even more pronounced in neonatal patients.
在接受幽门肌切开术的患者中,由于担心吸入,大多数医生优先快速确保气道通畅。然而,对于快速序贯诱导(RSI)和改良 RSI(mRSI)的选择,目前尚无共识,且证据有限。
回顾 2012 年 5 月至 2018 年 12 月期间所有接受幽门肌切开术的患者的病历。对所有确定的患者以及新生儿亚组,通过单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,比较 RSI 和 mRSI 组诱导期间发生低氧血症(外周血氧饱和度[Spo2],<90%)的风险。比较两组的并发症(吸入、入住重症监护病房、心动过缓、术后喘鸣和低血压)和初始插管成功率。
共确定 296 例患者:RSI 组 181 例,mRSI 组 115 例。RSI 组发生低氧血症的比率明显高于 mRSI 组(RSI,30%[23%-37%];mRSI,17%[10%-24%];P=.016)。对所有患者进行多变量逻辑回归分析,RSI 与 mRSI 相比,低氧血症的调整优势比(OR)为 2.8(95%置信区间[CI],1.5-5.3;P=.003),多次与单次插管尝试的 OR 为 11.4(95%CI,5.8-22.5;P<.001)。对新生儿亚组进行多变量逻辑回归分析,RSI 与 mRSI 相比,低氧血症的 OR 为 6.5(95%CI,2.0-22.2;P<.001),多次插管与单次插管尝试的 OR 为 18.1(95%CI,4.7-40;P<.001)。RSI 和 mRSI 组均无诱导相关并发症,两组初始插管成功率相同(78%)。
在接受幽门肌切开术的婴儿中,与 RSI 相比,mRSI 麻醉诱导与低氧血症发生率显著降低,且吸入事件无增加。此外,需要多次插管尝试是低氧血症的一个强烈预测因素。RSI 和多次插管尝试引起的低氧血症风险增加在新生儿患者中更为明显。