Division of Hematology/Oncology, Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Med Econ. 2020 Jan;23(1):37-47. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1651122. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
Bone complications (also known as skeletal-related events [SREs]) pose significant health and financial burdens on patients with bone metastases. Denosumab demonstrated superiority over zoledronic acid in delaying the time to first SRE. This study examined the lifetime cost-effectiveness of denosumab vs zoledronic acid from both US payer and societal perspectives. This analysis used a lifetime Markov model and included patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer, and other solid tumors and bone metastases. The societal perspective included direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs associated with denosumab and zoledronic acid; the payer perspective included direct medical costs only. Bone complication rates for each tumor type were estimated from three pivotal phase 3 studies and modified to reflect real-world incidence. From a societal perspective, compared with zoledronic acid, denosumab use resulted in an incremental cost of $9,043, an incremental benefit of 0.128 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), a lifetime cost per QALY of $70,730, and a net monetary benefit (NMB) of $10,135 in favor of denosumab. Direct drug costs for denosumab ($28,352) were higher than zoledronic acid/untreated ($578), but were offset by reduced costs associated with bone complications. From a payer perspective, denosumab use was associated with an incremental cost of $13,396, and an incremental benefit of 0.128 QALYs, for a cost of $104,778 per QALY and an NMB of $5,782 in favor of denosumab. Some model inputs had limited information and, given that the results may be sensitive to changes in these inputs, our findings should be interpreted within the context of the data inputs and modeling assumptions used in the analysis. Denosumab is a cost-effective option to prevent bone complications in patients with solid tumors when considering both payer and broader societal perspectives.
骨并发症(也称为骨骼相关事件[SREs])给患有骨转移的患者带来了重大的健康和经济负担。地舒单抗在延迟首次 SRE 方面优于唑来膦酸。本研究从美国支付者和社会角度检查了地舒单抗与唑来膦酸的终生成本效益。该分析使用了终生马尔可夫模型,包括乳腺癌、前列腺癌和其他实体瘤和骨转移患者。社会视角包括与地舒单抗和唑来膦酸相关的直接医疗、直接非医疗和间接成本;支付者视角仅包括直接医疗成本。根据三项关键的 3 期研究,估计了每种肿瘤类型的骨并发症发生率,并进行了修改以反映实际发生率。从社会角度来看,与唑来膦酸相比,地舒单抗的使用导致增量成本为 9043 美元,增量效益为 0.128 个质量调整生命年(QALY),终生每 QALY 成本为 70730 美元,净货币效益(NMB)为 10135 美元,有利于地舒单抗。地舒单抗的直接药物成本(28352 美元)高于唑来膦酸/未治疗(578 美元),但与骨并发症相关的成本降低相抵消。从支付者的角度来看,地舒单抗的使用与增量成本 13396 美元相关,增量效益 0.128 QALY,每 QALY 成本 104778 美元,NMB 为 5782 美元,有利于地舒单抗。一些模型输入信息有限,并且由于结果可能对这些输入的变化敏感,因此我们的发现应在分析中使用的数据输入和建模假设的背景下进行解释。从支付者和更广泛的社会角度来看,地舒单抗是预防实体瘤患者骨骼并发症的一种具有成本效益的选择。