Farrugia Kevin J, Hunter Danielle, Wilson Clarice, Hay Stef, Sherriffs Paul, Deacon Paul
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Leicester School of Pharmacy, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, U.K.
School of Science, Engineering & Technology, Division of Science, Abertay University, Dundee, DD1 1HG, U.K.
J Forensic Sci. 2020 Jan;65(1):248-254. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14140. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
This study presents a number of pseudo-operational trials on plastic bags investigating the double- and co-fuming process of a one-step fluorescent cyanoacrylate (Lumicyano ) in comparisons with the two-step process with basic yellow 40 (BY40) staining for the detection of latent fingermarks. The results demonstrate that both Lumicyano solution and dye contribute to the increased detection of latent fingermarks during the double-fuming process (trial 1). Co-fuming the Lumicyano solution and dye separately (at a concentration of 8%) but simultaneously was less effective than 8% Lumicyano (trial 2). Co-fuming Lumicyano 8% and an additional 8% Lumicyano dye by weight was more effective than Lumicyano 8% (trial 3), possibly due to increased fluorescent material deposition during co-fuming allowing for better visualization. The use of BY40 after Lumicyano resulted in a considerable increase in detected fingermarks.
本研究针对塑料袋进行了多项模拟操作试验,研究一步法荧光氰基丙烯酸酯(Lumicyano)的双重熏蒸和共熏蒸过程,并与使用碱性黄40(BY40)染色的两步法进行比较,以检测潜在指纹。结果表明,在双重熏蒸过程中(试验1),Lumicyano溶液和染料均有助于提高潜在指纹的检出率。将Lumicyano溶液和染料分别以8%的浓度同时进行共熏蒸,其效果不如8%的Lumicyano溶液(试验2)。按重量将8%的Lumicyano与额外8%的Lumicyano染料进行共熏蒸比8%的Lumicyano溶液更有效(试验3),这可能是由于共熏蒸过程中荧光物质沉积增加,从而便于更好地观察。在使用Lumicyano之后再使用BY40,可使检测到的指纹数量大幅增加。