Suppr超能文献

基于工作的导师制培养临床推理能力以改善患者结局的临床效果评价:一项 stepped wedge 型群组随机对照试验。

Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of a work-based mentoring programme to develop clinical reasoning on patient outcome: A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

University Hospital of Wales Physiotherapy Department, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.

School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0220110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220110. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite persistent calls to measure the effectiveness of educational interventions on patient outcomes, few studies have been conducted. Within musculoskeletal physiotherapy, the effects of clinical mentoring on postgraduate physiotherapists have been explored, but its impact on patient outcomes is unknown. The objective of this trial was to assess the effectiveness of a work-based mentoring programme to facilitate physiotherapist clinical reasoning on patient outcomes.

METHODS

In a stepped-wedge cluster RCT in the musculoskeletal physiotherapy outpatient departments of a large NHS organisation, 16 physiotherapists were randomised by cluster to receive the intervention-150 hours of mentored clinical practice-at one of 3 time periods; control was usual training. 441 patients submitted outcome measures: Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) (primary outcome measure), EQ-5D-5L, patient activation and patient satisfaction (secondary outcome measures). A further secondary outcome measure of physiotherapist performance was collected by an independent assessor observing the physiotherapists practice.

RESULTS

80.0% of intervention patients achieved clinically significant PSFS scores compared with 63.8% of control patients. Binary logistic regression analysis modelling for time, cluster and patient characteristics showed strong statistical evidence for this difference (p = 0.023; odds ratio 4.24, 95%CI 1.22, 14.79). Physiotherapist performance scores improved from a mean of 47.8% (SD 3.60) pre-intervention to a mean of 56.0% (SD 4.24) (p<0.001). There was no statistical evidence for differences between groups on other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study that we aware of that provides patient outcomes measurement of an established educational intervention in physiotherapy, providing evidence that this type of intervention positively impacts patient outcomes and physiotherapist performance. This provides a basis for further research in education across other healthcare disciplines and outcome measures.

摘要

背景

尽管人们一直呼吁衡量教育干预对患者结局的有效性,但进行的研究很少。在肌肉骨骼物理治疗领域,已经探讨了临床指导对研究生物理治疗师的影响,但尚不清楚其对患者结局的影响。本试验的目的是评估基于工作的指导计划对促进物理治疗师临床推理和患者结局的有效性。

方法

在一项针对大型 NHS 组织肌肉骨骼物理治疗门诊部门的阶梯式楔形集群 RCT 中,16 名物理治疗师按集群随机分为干预组(接受 150 小时的指导临床实践)和对照组(接受常规培训)。在 3 个时间段中的 1 个时间段接受干预;对照组接受常规培训。共有 441 名患者提交了结局测量结果:患者特定功能量表(PSFS)(主要结局测量指标)、EQ-5D-5L、患者激活和患者满意度(次要结局测量指标)。由独立评估员观察物理治疗师的实践来收集物理治疗师绩效的另一个次要结局测量结果。

结果

与对照组(63.8%)相比,干预组(80.0%)中有更多的患者达到了 PSFS 评分的临床显著改善。对时间、集群和患者特征进行二元逻辑回归分析模型显示,这种差异具有很强的统计学证据(p = 0.023;优势比 4.24,95%CI 1.22,14.79)。物理治疗师绩效评分从干预前的平均 47.8%(SD 3.60)提高到干预后的平均 56.0%(SD 4.24)(p<0.001)。在其他次要结局方面,两组之间没有统计学差异的证据。

结论

这是我们所知道的第一项提供物理治疗中已确立教育干预的患者结局测量结果的研究,为这种类型的干预对患者结局和物理治疗师绩效产生积极影响提供了证据。这为在其他医疗保健学科和结局测量中开展教育方面的进一步研究提供了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae9/6668791/834999a1ab2b/pone.0220110.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验