School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Oct;43:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
Understanding of the biopsychosocial characteristics of greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS), a prevalent lower limb tendinopathy, is currently lacking.
To quantify differences in participant characteristics between individuals with GTPS and healthy control participants.
Systematic review of original studies with meta-analyses where appropriate.
A comprehensive electronic search was undertaken in Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL for terms referring to GTPS. Studies that provided comparison of individuals with clinically characterized GTPS with healthy controls were included. Study quality was rated with the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cross Sectional Studies. Standardized mean differences were calculated and supported by narrative synthesis or meta-analyses where appropriate. Certainty of evidence was assessed based on the GRADE guidelines.
The search revealed 2798 studies, of which 13 studies from five research groups were included. There were 229 participants with at least three months duration of GTPS and 193 control participants. Individuals with GTPS displayed larger greater trochanteric width, greater body mass index, lower hip abductor muscle strength, higher hip abductor muscle activity, altered single leg loading and gait parameters including shorter step length and velocity. No studies investigating psychological features or sensory perception were identified. Quality of life was investigated in a single study.
Compared to healthy controls, participants with GTPS are more overweight, have poorer hip abductor muscle function and altered gait parameters. Overall quality of evidence across studies was very low based on GRADE guidelines.
目前对大转子疼痛综合征(GTPS)这一常见下肢腱病的生物心理社会特征缺乏了解。
量化 GTPS 患者与健康对照组参与者特征的差异。
对原始研究进行系统评价,并在适当情况下进行荟萃分析。
在 Pubmed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 CINAHL 中对涉及 GTPS 的术语进行全面的电子检索。纳入提供临床特征性 GTPS 患者与健康对照组比较的研究。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所横断面研究批判性评估清单对研究质量进行评估。计算标准化均数差,并在适当情况下进行叙述性综合或荟萃分析。根据 GRADE 指南评估证据的确定性。
搜索结果显示有 2798 项研究,其中 5 个研究小组的 13 项研究被纳入。共有 229 名 GTPS 患者(病程至少 3 个月)和 193 名健康对照组参与者。GTPS 患者的大转子宽度更大,身体质量指数更高,髋关节外展肌力量更低,髋关节外展肌活动度更高,单腿负重和步态参数发生改变,包括步长和速度缩短。没有研究调查心理特征或感觉知觉。仅有一项研究调查了生活质量。
与健康对照组相比,GTPS 患者超重,髋关节外展肌功能较差,步态参数发生改变。根据 GRADE 指南,各项研究的总体证据质量非常低。