Service de Pneumologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP and Université Paris Descartes (UMR1016, Institut Cochin), Sorbonne Paris Cite, 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
Programme Colibri, Association pour la complémentarité des connaissances et des pratiques de la pneumologie (aCCPP), 19 avenue Marcelin Berthelot, 38100, Grenoble, France; Université Grenoble Alpes, Faculté de médecine et pharmacie, 23 Avenue Maquis du Grésivaudan, 38700, La Tronche, France.
Respir Med. 2019 Sep;156:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
Over the last decade, new evidence and many guidelines have been published on COPD pharmacological treatments; prescriptions are often not in accordance with guidelines.
Trends in physician treatment choices from February 2012 to November 2018 (Feb.2012/Nov.2018) were analyzed using data from COPD patients (spirometry-confirmed diagnosis) included in the COLIBRI-COPD cohort. Inhaled drug treatments (short- or long-acting β2-agonist [SABA or LABA], short- or long-acting anticholinergic [SAMA or LAMA], or corticosteroid [ICS]) were classified into 5 treatment categories: "No initial maintenance treatment (IMT)" (untreated, or only SAMA or SABA); "1 long-acting bronchodilator (LABD)" (LABA or LAMA); "2 LABDs" (LABA + LAMA); "1 LABD + ICS" (LABA or LAMA + ICS); "2 LABDs + ICS" (LABA + LAMA + ICS). For the purpose of the study, 4 periods were defined to achieve balanced samples (T1-T4).
Data from 4537 patients were collected. Over time, 3 major changes were observed: (1) an increase in treatment category "No IMT", mostly for GOLD 1 or GOLD A categories (GOLD A: from 19.1% at T1 to 41.2% at T4); (2) an increase in treatment category "2 LABDs" for GOLD 2 to 4 and GOLD A to D categories (GOLD B: from 15.4% to 29.7%); (3) a decrease in ICS use ("1 LABD + ICS" or "2 LABDs + ICS"), mostly for GOLD 1 to 3 and GOLD A categories (GOLD A, 2 LABDs + ICS: from 35.3% to 11.1%).
Changes over time in therapeutic profiles suggest that new evidence from scientific publications and recommendations may have had a rapid impact on clinical practice.
在过去的十年中,已经发表了许多关于 COPD 药物治疗的新证据和指南;但处方往往与指南不符。
使用 COLIBRI-COPD 队列中包含的 COPD 患者(肺量计确诊诊断)的数据,分析了 2012 年 2 月至 2018 年 11 月(2012 年 2 月/2018 年 11 月)医生治疗选择的趋势。吸入药物治疗(短效或长效β2-激动剂[SABA 或 LABA]、短效或长效抗胆碱能药物[SAMA 或 LAMA]或皮质类固醇[ICS])分为 5 种治疗类别:“无初始维持治疗(IMT)”(未治疗,或仅 SAMA 或 SABA);“1 种长效支气管扩张剂(LABD)”(LABA 或 LAMA);“2 种 LABDs”(LABA+LAMA);“1 种 LABD+ICS”(LABA 或 LAMA+ICS);“2 种 LABD+ICS”(LABA+LAMA+ICS)。为了研究目的,定义了 4 个时期以实现平衡样本(T1-T4)。
共收集了 4537 名患者的数据。随着时间的推移,观察到了 3 个主要变化:(1)“无 IMT”治疗类别的增加,主要针对 GOLD 1 或 GOLD A 类别(GOLD A:从 T1 的 19.1%增加到 T4 的 41.2%);(2)GOLD 2 至 4 和 GOLD A 至 D 类别的“2 种 LABDs”治疗类别的增加(GOLD B:从 15.4%增加到 29.7%);(3)ICS 使用减少(“1 种 LABD+ICS”或“2 种 LABD+ICS”),主要针对 GOLD 1 至 3 和 GOLD A 类别(GOLD A,2 种 LABD+ICS:从 35.3%减少到 11.1%)。
治疗方案随时间的变化表明,科学出版物和建议中的新证据可能对临床实践产生了快速影响。