Markolf Keith L, Wang Dean, Joshi Nirav B, Cheung Edward, Petrigliano Frank A, McAllister David R
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 10833 Le Conte Ave, 76-143 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 10833 Le Conte Ave, 76-143 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 Dec;70:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.07.025. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
The purpose of this study was to directly compare spiked washer and suture-post tibial-sided fixation techniques used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by measuring anterior tibial translation during cyclic tests.
Fresh-frozen human knees were tested using a robotic system that applied 250 cycles of anterior-posterior tibial force (134 N) at 30° flexion, while recording tibial translation. Ten intact knees were tested to collect baseline data for native specimens. A single knee was selected to test ligament reconstructions using doubled tibialis tendon allografts. All grafts were fixed proximally using an EndoButton™, and the tibial end of the graft was fixed with either a spiked washer or with a suture post placed at two different locations (near and distant) relative to the tibial tunnel.
Mean first cycle translation for intact knees was 4.8 (sd 1.8) mm; means after reconstruction were 2.6 (sd 0.9) mm (spiked washer), 10.1 (sd 1.9) mm (suture post near), and 10.4 (sd 1.5) mm (suture post distant). Corresponding means for translation increase over 250 cycles were 0.3 (sd 0.2) mm, 3.6 (sd 1.3) mm, 7.2 mm (sd 0.9) mm, and 8.0 (sd 1.3) mm. All mean increases (first cycle and cyclic) after ACL reconstruction were significantly greater than those for the intact knees, and all means with a suture post were significantly greater than those with a spiked washer. There were no significant differences between mean translations for near and distant suture post locations.
Use of suture post fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is questioned since increases in anterior tibial translation could lead to excessive post-operative knee laxity and possibly early clinical failure.
本研究的目的是通过在循环测试中测量胫骨前移,直接比较用于前交叉韧带重建的带刺垫圈和缝线桩胫骨侧固定技术。
使用机器人系统对新鲜冷冻的人体膝关节进行测试,该系统在30°屈曲时施加250次前后向胫骨力(134 N),同时记录胫骨平移。测试10个完整的膝关节以收集天然标本的基线数据。选择一个膝关节使用双股异体胫骨肌腱进行韧带重建测试。所有移植物均在近端使用EndoButton™固定,移植物的胫骨端用带刺垫圈或相对于胫骨隧道在两个不同位置(近和远)放置的缝线桩固定。
完整膝关节的平均首次循环平移为4.8(标准差1.8)mm;重建后的平均值分别为2.6(标准差0.9)mm(带刺垫圈)、10.1(标准差1.9)mm(近缝线桩)和10.4(标准差1.5)mm(远缝线桩)。250次循环中相应的平移增加平均值分别为0.3(标准差0.2)mm、3.6(标准差1.3)mm、7.2(标准差0.9)mm和8.0(标准差1.3)mm。前交叉韧带重建后所有平均增加量(首次循环和循环)均显著大于完整膝关节,所有缝线桩固定的平均值均显著大于带刺垫圈固定的平均值。近缝线桩和远缝线桩位置的平均平移之间无显著差异。
前交叉韧带重建使用缝线桩固定受到质疑,因为胫骨前移增加可能导致术后膝关节过度松弛并可能导致早期临床失败。