Studium Patavinum - Dept. of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Italy; Science of Consciousness Research Group, Dept. of General Psychology, University of Padua, Italy; Inst. F. Granone - Italian Center of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (CIICS), Turin, Italy.
IRCCS, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, via Capecelatro 66, 20148 Milan, Italy.
Med Hypotheses. 2019 Sep;130:109274. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109274. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
The topic of multiple personality, redefined as Dissociative Identity Disorders (DIDs) in the DSM-5, is an intriguing and still debated disorder with a long history and deep cultural and epistemological implications, extending up to the idea of possession. Hypnosis is an appealing and valuable model to manipulate subjective experience and get an insight on both the physiology and the pathophysiology of the mind-brain functioning; it and has been closely connected with DIDs and possession since its origin in 18th century and as recently proved the capacity to yield a loss of sense of agency, mimicking delusions of alien control and spirit possession. In this study we report on five very uncommon "hypnotic virtuosos" (HVs) free from any psychiatric disorder, spontaneously undergoing the emergence of multiple identities during neutral hypnosis; this allowed us to check the relationship between their experience and fMRI data. During hypnosis the subjects underwent spontaneous non-intrusive experiences of other selves which were not recalled after the end of the session, due to post-hypnotic amnesia. The fMRI showed a significant decrease of connectivity in the Default Mode Network (DMN) especially between the posterior cingulate cortex and the medial prefrontal cortex. Our results and their contrast with the available data on fMRI in DIDs allows to draw the hypothesis of a continuum between healthy mind - where multiple identities may coexist at unconscious level and may sometimes emerge to the consciousness - and DIDs, where multiple personalities emerge as dissociated, ostensibly autonomous components yielding impaired functioning, subject's loss of control and suffering. If this is the case, it seems more reasonable to refrain from seeking for a clear-cut limit between normality (anyway a conventional, statistical concept) and pathology, and accept a grey area in between, where ostensibly odd but non-pathological experiences may occur (including so-called non-ordinary mental expressions) without calling for treatment but, rather, for being properly understood.
多重人格的话题,在 DSM-5 中被重新定义为分离性身份障碍 (DID),是一种引人入胜且仍在争论的障碍,具有悠久的历史和深刻的文化和认识论意义,甚至延伸到附身的概念。催眠是一种吸引人且有价值的模型,可以操纵主观体验,并深入了解身心功能的生理学和病理生理学;它自 18 世纪起源以来就与 DID 和附身密切相关,最近也被证明有能力产生代理权丧失,模拟外来控制和精神附身的妄想。在这项研究中,我们报告了五位非常罕见的“催眠高手”(HV),他们没有任何精神障碍,在中性催眠中自发地出现多重身份;这使我们能够检查他们的经验与 fMRI 数据之间的关系。在催眠中,受试者会经历其他自我的自发非侵入性体验,但由于催眠后遗忘,这些体验不会在会话结束后被回忆起来。fMRI 显示默认模式网络 (DMN) 的连接性显著降低,特别是在后扣带回皮层和内侧前额叶皮层之间。我们的结果与 DID 中 fMRI 的可用数据形成对比,使我们可以提出一个假设,即在健康的心智和 DID 之间存在一个连续体,在健康的心智中,多重身份可能在无意识层面共存,有时会出现在意识层面;而在 DID 中,多重人格则以分离的、表面上自主的成分出现,导致功能受损、个体失去控制和痛苦。如果是这样,那么似乎更合理的做法是避免在正常(无论如何是一个传统的、统计的概念)和病理之间寻求明确的界限,并接受中间的灰色地带,在这个地带可能会出现表面上奇怪但非病理性的体验(包括所谓的非寻常的精神表达),而不需要治疗,而是需要正确理解。